Land, Homes and the Changing Economy

Hood River Valley Residents Form Competing Groups Over Measure 37


By Dan Richardson, 12-27-06

 
 

How many farmers would get out of the business if a better offer came along?

A bushel-full of them.

Counting the latest Measure 37 claims, greater than a fifth of Hood River Valley’s farmland could be developed into housing projects and golf courses, according to a brief from Oregon Public Broadcasting.

That’s among the latest and most pointed land-use stories making the rounds. As I’ve reported previously, the Hood River Valley farmers are subject to increasing pressures and decreasing profits, which make potentially lucrative Measure 37 claims, for many, keenly desired.

To its credit, the Hood River News has awakened to this unfolding drama in its backyard and has been reporting an ongoing series on Measure 37 in recent weeks. The latest installment is a defense by valley orchardists who are filing claims — and want to tell the “other side” of Measure 37.

Says farmer Camille Hukari, “The concept that we are trying to ‘pave over paradise’ is sort of a Chicken Little ‘the sky is falling’ argument that is an emotional scare tactic to create fear. We think the facts will set the record straight.”

The sky doesn’t fall until two-fifths of the farms are sold to wealthy Portlanders and Californians.

The valley now hosts two competing resident groups: Measure 37 claimants have formed the Hood River Agriculture, Forestry and Landowners Association to lobby in Salem and counteract the conservationist efforts of the Hood River Valley Residents Committee. Committee members have filed several lawsuits challenging how the state sets compensation and waives regulations under Measure 37.

Reporting on the changing economy continues with forestry companies getting out of the business of cutting trees. The Oregonian published a couple of recent articles about how timber companies are making claims under Measure 37, and elsewhere are opening up large land lots — like a 425,000-acre parcel in Maine — to develop as trees run out or regulations limit their cutting.

The trend is clear: The resource economy is dire straights, being too much work or too little profit, especially when condos and resort homes promise so much payoff. Why plant and tend and harvest for little, when you can build for much?

Yet, isn’t there a point at which the appetite for second homes in the woods will be satisfied? Really, how many people can afford million-dollar vacation houses?

And how much of the land are we willing to pave over to find out?



Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.

NEW WEST FEATURES                                                                 More>>

Advertisement

Comments

By Demi, 12-27-06
By dan, 12-29-06
By Demi, 1-02-07

Comment policy:

NewWest.Net encourages robust and lively, but civil participation from our readers. By posting here, you agree to the NewWest.Net terms of service. You agree to keep your comments on topic, respectful and free of gratuitous profanity. Contributions that engage in personal attacks, racism, sexism, bigotry, hatred or are otherwise patently offensive will be subject to removal.

Other than using a filter that scans for comment spam, we do not moderate contributions before they are posted and we do not review every thread, so we ask that you help us in keeping the discussions civil and appropriate. Please email info@newwest.net to notify us of comments that may violate these guidelines. Thanks for your help and cooperation. Click here for some tips on how to best interact on NewWest.Net.

Your Comment

Name

Email

Remember my name and email address.

Notify me of follow-up comments.

 

Marketplace