Idaho Politics: Commentary
Idaho Poised to Move on Gay Rights?
By Jill Kuraitis, 1-21-08
| Rep. Nicole LeFavour (D-Boise) represents the capital city's North End neighborhood. | |
This is today’s entry from Boise Democratic Rep. Nicole LeFavour’s blog, posted with her permission.
This morning the Idaho legislature made a little history. On this day when we celebrate Martin Luther King Jr. Day, the Senate State Affairs Committee voted to print the first piece of legislation to mention sexual orientation, and to propose ending centuries of discrimination against gays and lesbians in employment, housing, education and public accommodation.
Leslie Goddard, director of the Human Rights Commission beautifully presented the bill after an introduction by Senator Tim Corder, a major sponsor of the legislation. Some may remember the Mountain Home Republican Senator from a City Club debate in 2006 or from his past vote to ban gay marriage in Idaho’s Constitution. His support of this year’s legislation speaks loudly to the fundamental fairness implicit in the issue of employment discrimination and to the progress made on understanding of these issues over the years.
Nothing, except giving thanks to those who vote well, is more important than dedicating ourselves to having positive, gentle interactions with legislators who are still on the road to understanding these issues and voting as we would wish. I will never fault a community frustrated with waiting so many long years to see a day when we cannot be fired from our jobs solely because we are gay. Still, I hope it is well noted that Senator Little was one of the majority voting yes in support this morning, the man who bravely helped hold off the Constitutional Amendment for two years before bowing to extremely intense political pressure. Again his vote speaks to the importance of patience and how different and fundamental this issue is from marriage which so unfortunately intersects with church and religion.
In what I hope will help bolster a budding coalition of conservatives and moderates, the Boise State University (BSU) public policy survey this year found that 63% or Idahoans feel it should be illegal to fire someone just because they are or are perceived to be gay, that was a majority in every region of the state and both political parties. Clearly those numbers take this out of the realm of being election year issue and show that basic fairness crosses all kinds of political lines. Who today doesn’t know someone affected by this issue? In fact, how many legislators still do not have a family member or friend who is touched by what we deliberate today?
The bill, which would revise Idaho’s 1968 Human Rights Act, applies to businesses with more than five employees. It would make it unlawful to discriminate against workers because of their sexual orientation. Religious organizations would be exempt.
Current Idaho law forbids workplace and housing discrimination based on race, sex, religion, color or national origin.
The state legislatures which have passed similar laws were Democratic majorities. Twenty states, the District of Columbia, and over 140 cities and counties have such laws. In the West, California, Washington, Oregon, Colorado and Nevada have laws banning sexual orientation discrimination in employment.
There is no federal law against housing discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, but at least thirteen states have enacted laws banning it.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.
Comments
And just remember, those that protest the loudest are usually guilty of the same thing they protest against. For reference, see Larry Craig.
Even my 80 year old Ohio Mom thinks it's wrong to be mean to "...the Gays..." . Bless her heart .
WOW , Idaho enters the 21st Century . . .
Way COOL !
Change the wording from sexual orientation to race or color. Then just maybe your simple little brain might comprehend what homosexuals (or even just accused homosexuals) can face on any given day.
So when you defend the homophobic employers that fire good workers based only on vague passages from a really old book and think that the 'content of one's character' can be assertained by their sexuality, don't be surprised when those around you begin to be disgusted by your words and actions.
It's sad , 'they' Always need an enemy , , ,
While 'they' pretend to Proclaim the "Prince of Peace" .
GO FIGURE .