Election 2010
In Idaho, We Always Have Choices
Guest Opinion by Candidate for Idaho Governor Keith AllredBy Keith Allred, Guest Writer, 3-31-10
![]() |
|
In Idaho, it is our choices—more than our circumstances—that determine our destiny. No matter how tough things get, we still have the opportunity to improve our circumstances or make them worse.
Of course, when times get really tough, it can feel like those options are slipping away. Maybe that’s what happened to Governor Butch Otter. At the beginning of the legislative session, he told us that our economic circumstances were so bad, the only thing we could do was make big cuts and hope things get better.
That just isn’t true. We always have choices.
But that’s not what we saw in Otter’s decision-making. Otter decided to go down in Idaho history as the first governor to spend less on our children’s education in the coming year than he spent in the last. And it’s not just a little bit less; it’s $128 million less. Most of us didn’t need Republican Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Luna to tell us that Otter’s cuts will cause significant and lasting damage to student achievement. We knew it ourselves.
There were better avenues open to us. First, we could have built a budget based on evidence rather than despair. All four independent, fact-based economic projections that Idaho governors usually consult when building a budget said that we’ll see more than $80 million in revenue growth next year. Second, we could have taken the Tax Commission’s recommendation to fund additional staff to go after tax deadbeats and net $60 million in additional revenue.
Those two actions would have garnered $140 million in revenue, more than enough to offset the $128 million cut to education that the governor championed.
The problem is that Otter has fallen into a pattern of making poor choices. Now, these decisions have made our current circumstances tougher than they need to be.
During this recession, Idaho’s economy has struggled more than surrounding states. We’ve had higher unemployment, higher foreclosure rates, and lower economic growth than our neighbors even though we’re all facing the same economic storm. They’ve done better because they made better plans before the weather got bad.
We still have opportunities to improve our situation. We can pursue more strategic and aggressive funding for K-12 and higher education. And we can make sure that promising new businesses have access to capital. Doing this has helped surrounding states attract jobs that pay better and are more stable even in tough economic times. It can help Idaho.
Even though Otter’s decisions during this year’s legislative session will create challenges down the road, the citizens of Idaho still have time to make their own choice. In the 2010 election we can choose to stick with a leader who submits to tough circumstances or choose a leader who believes in taking our destiny into our own hands.
We always have choices. They’re just more important when times are tough.
Keith Allred is a candidate for governor 2010. He lives in Eagle with his family.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
Allred: "We’ve had higher unemployment, higher foreclosure rates, and lower economic growth than our neighbors even though we’re all facing the same economic storm."
That's compelling, if true. Where are the statistics coming from, to support that statement?
I'd suggest Nevada and arguably other "neighbor" states are faring worse than Idaho. Utah, Wyoming and Montana seem to be doing better... is it the vision of their "progressive" state leaders?
Let's look at the facts about state budgets throughout the USA...none of them are in great shape. But..inn states like NY, NJ and CA unsustainable and blotted public union deals are bankrupting the states. Should we follow their lead and "invest" more in "children" & "k-12" (code for more unaccountable people under the protection of the public teacher's union).
Here in Idaho we have our problems...but at least we aren't broke like most of our neighbors. Their budgets are unsustainable.
How can anyone with any sense ask for another penny of taxpayer money for K-12 when you can't even fire the worst public school teachers in this country? The teacher's unions are the #1 roadblock to real progress in student achievement. They block any discussions of merit based pay, removal of poor teachers, school competition, lengthening the school year etc. This just doesn't make sense.
Please, these issues are so much more complex. More $ to the state government is not the answer.
-Boise Resident.
Don't raise taxes for anything but building new sports arenas; and continue to insist that education is a local issue to be decided--according to the most pedestrian values--by a pack of amateurs elected to sinecures for which they receive peanuts.
My folks, all of them (my family is extended, in a GOOD way), are pretty smart, well-read, et cetera. And with one exception, who happens to be the "dumb" one, they all had stints at one-room schoolhouses in Jerkwater, Nowhere, in the Depression.
My own trip through the system was pretty much a bare-bones kind of deal, there weren't a lot of extras aside from the Rs. Class, lunch in a bag, recess, and gym. The books were mostly used, the desks carved up, the classes big and boring, the paddle painful.
Budget cuts might force a focus on the basics, which usually work pretty well if you look past social engineering.
Idaho is suffering, from excessive conservative ideology of governance. The current archaic model of conservatism has nothing left to offer the people of Idaho, they rely on the big lie that Government is the problem.
The days of blaming government for problems is over…!
Think about it tater’s, not a single home foreclosure throughout the economic crisis has been caused by excessive taxation. The dysfunctional health system with massive corporate profits that leaves patients with horrendous debt is not from to many taxes.
Banks haven’t catastrophically failed because of over-sized personal W-2 forms.
Idaho companies haven’t been driven to lay-offs because their tax burden is too high.
That beast of conservatism continues the false claims that we can’t get ahead because we’re over taxed and we need to cuts tax and reduce government.
That claim is absurd and false…!
Today we start by holding those conservatives in unchallenged power responsible for their over 25 years of willful destruction of government to meet a political party’s ideological goal.
The Idaho Republicans have forced Idaho’s middle class & poor to pay a the largest percentage of their salaries to total taxes in our history, while the wealthiest Idahoans and corporations pay less in total taxes than ever before in history.
Trickle down right…do you really believe that nonsense!
It’s about maintaining unchallenged power, control over state tax money and successfully swaying the low information Idahoan to vote against there own interests.
Good luck Allred.
Still don't think Teachers' Unions are getting in the way of education reform in this country? Still think that all we need to do is throw more money at the problem? Then you might want to check out the state of the school system in Oregon...our neighbor.
http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2010/04/race_to_the_top_oregon_school.html
Reform means...
1) Changing the school year to a "year round" system (summer breaks are a relic of an agricultural based society and hurt poor kids more than middle class and rich kids because the poor kids fall behind more with extended time away from the school environment.
2) Taking back control of hiring/firing of teachers from the Unions. It is totally unacceptable that poor teachers can't be let go.
3) Pay the good and great teachers even more for their performance (this does not mean using only standardized tests to evaluate teacher performance). Let the others go. Contrary to what many Unions say...we can do without some of the teachers out there....and class size has never been proven to improve the quality of an education.
4) Empower LOCAL solutions to school district problems. Top down solutions don't work. More rules, regulations and federal interference = more $ spent on administration.
5) Allow students to choose from a list of schools that compete for their tuition money. The amount of money that is assigned per student is calculated according to their parent's income, testing level, special needs etc. This sort of competition works for U.S. Universities why not use the same system for our K-12?
Peace Out!
2.) Having nobody to intercede on behalf of employees has long been a capitalist dream--realized in the early years of America by endentured servitude--then slavery--and now by unrestricted immigration of peons, coolies, etc.
3.) Capitalism is well-served by extortion. Salaries set by elected sinecures are well-served by the principle of termination just prior to tenure or retirement; and piece-work has always resulted in superficially rewarding short-term increases in profitability.
4.) Local solutions do ensure that pedestrianism and parochialism continues to control populations.
5.) For profit schooling will certainly serve the elitism at the heart of neo-conservatism.