Big Rigs
Judge Rules Against Montana Dept. of Transportation, Haulting Megaload Shipments
Preliminary injunction finds in favor of Missoula County and three environmental groups fighting to stop transport of oil equipment to Alberta Oil Sands.By New West Editor, 7-20-11
![]() |
|
| One of two megaloads workers hauled through Missoula in March. Photo: Greta Rybus. | |
In what appears to be a major victory for those fighting the transport of oversized oil refinery equipment through Idaho and Montana to the Kearl Oil Sands in Canada, a judge has ruled that the Montana Department of Transportation is in violation of the law and issued a preliminary injunction.
Judge Ray Dayton, a district court judge in Anaconda, found the Department of Transportation was in default in accepting a less-than-adequate environmental assessment regarding the construction of turnouts, which are essential for the rigs as they travel from Lewiston, Idaho, along the Lochsa River on Highway 12 over Lolo Pass and into Montana, where they’d also traverse Highway 200 and other two-lane roads. The judgment was in favor of the four plaintiffs, most notably Missoula County, which was joined in the suit by environmental groups National Wildlife Federation, Montana Environmental Information Center and the Montana chapter of the Sierra Club.
The plaintiffs claimed the department “failed to adequately consider impacts of the project and failed to adequately consider reasonable alternatives.” The judge agreed and also pointed out the department should have and did not identify which turnouts were temporary and which would be permanent. By not knowing, or not saying, it’d be unclear what the future environmental impact would be, he said.
Dwane Kailey, chief operations officer, engineer and highways administrator for the department, testified before Dayton that the decision to remove turnouts would be made “in the future, based on the benefit to the public,” according to Dayton’s memo on the decision.
That raised several questions. Among them, according to the decision: “Whether the turnouts are left in place will necessarily affect whether the route will accommodate future loads of similar size.” That’s a key point, as critics of the haul have expressed doubts that the 207 loads bound for Alberta will be the end of the megaloads along scenic byways. Indeed, a 2009 report from a hauler for Exxon/Mobil indicated the project will be a “game changer for Alberta’s oil sands developers,” opening up a “high-load corridor.”
Contacted by the Missoulian, Pius Rolheiser, spokesman for Imperial Oil, said the Calgary-based company was disappointed with Dayton’s ruling.
“As we’ve just received the judge’s order, we will need time to assess, understand and determine our next steps,” Rolheiser said.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
Wonders never cease.
these loads are smaller and safe- Obviously this "GOD" is not from Montana or he was well schooled with the Garbage that flows from the Mussoula Law school in recent years.
Keep his name fresh, as he will run for some Political Office on the Left side of the Mountain.
I bet the REAL Attorneys & folks in Anaconda are embarassed !!
Job well done!
-------------
This sounds like the trucker who dumped loads of gigantic toilet paper rolls into the Lochsa River recently when he jumped a guard rail on Rt. 12.
Go figure.
Meanwhile, the paid to play commenters are extra busy doing their thang.
Tough T, guys.
Are you kidding me? This is all shot down over wide spots in the road? The same wide spots visitors like to use? The same wide spots outfitters stage their clients? The same wide spots good for plow turnarounds and other whatnot?
Wonders never cease.
Have you ever been along this route? If you have then you'd understand. One of the most beautiful areas in the world getting torn up and polluted to make big oil richer...way to be.
Wise up, dummy.
These oil companies don't give two hoots about anything but the almighty dollar in the big shots butts.