WYOFILE FEATURE
Montana Officials ‘Take Step Back’ to Review Chief Joe Gold Transport Plan
The plan calls for hauling up to 35 double-trailer loads every weekday June 1 – Sept. 15 as part of a $24 million cleanup project.By Ruffin Prevost, WyoFile , Guest Writer, 11-19-10
![]() |
|
| Contractors working on a mine cleanup project near Cooke City plan to use double-trailer truck rigs like the one seen here during an October test run over the Chief Joseph Highway and back into Montana. Wyoming residents have expressed concerns about safety and other issues connected to using the slow-moving, heavily loaded rigs, which measure 97 feet from front to rear axle. Photo: Montana Department of Environmental Quality via WyoFile | |
Montana officials have pledged to “take a step back” and re-evaluate a plan to haul tens of thousands of tons of contaminated mine tailings next summer from Cooke City, Mont., over the Chief Joseph Scenic Highway, one of Park County’s steepest and most serpentine highways.
Richard Opper, director of the Montana Department of Environmental Quality, apologized Tuesday to dozens of Wyoming residents who raised concerns about expected heavy truck traffic, and who said they had felt shut out during earlier project planning.
Opper said he understood why Park County residents might “feel like this project got sprung on you, and I would feel exactly the same way if I was in your position.”
The $24 million cleanup project connects several disparate policy issues, including government transparency, public involvement, environmental laws and highway regulations. It has developed amid a history of sometimes fractious interstate relations and a legacy of failed mining operations in the region.
The haul plan got off to a rocky start locally after a Wyoming Department of Transportation engineer learned this spring that trucking companies were bidding on a contract to haul nearly 69,000 tons of mine waste over the 47-mile Chief Joseph Highway to Whitehall, Mont., a 640-mile round trip.
Traces of gold left in the mill tailings — a fraction of an ounce for every ton of waste — will be extracted at a Whitehall facility and used to help offset the cost of their removal from the site, as well as the rest of the cleanup. But most of the tailings will be moved to a repository a few miles from the current mill site.
For decades, acidic pollutants from the tailings have been leaching into Soda Butte Creek, which flows into Yellowstone National Park and the Lamar River.
Opper denied claims that Montana would profit from the extracted gold. He said the plan to spend the first summer of the six-year project hauling away about 20 percent of the tailings arose only after engineers realized late in the process that the new repository was too small to safely hold all the waste.
Opper said the hauling plan only became viable in early 2010, as the price of gold rose, although he has given conflicting figures for the “break-even” price at which gold sales make hauling tailings economically possible.
Planners had initially considered spending two or three summers hauling additional tailings away, since processing revenues would cover trucking costs, Opper said.
But subsequent objections from Wyoming residents made that option less attractive, he said.
SPECIFIC ADVICE
Elected officials and residents on Tuesday offered Opper specific advice on everything from avoiding vehicle collisions with federally protected grizzly bears to what kind of heavy equipment is best for towing disabled trucks and trailers.
“This was one of the most productive public meetings I’ve been to in a long time,” Opper said after the gathering.
Rep. Pat Childers (R-Cody) said he was satisfied with the belated chance for local input, and was optimistic that Montana DEQ would revisit its haul plan based on comments from residents and state and local officials.
“There’s a whole lot of things they had missed, and they’re receptive to those things,” said Childers, who was among the first to voice objections about the haul plan.
Among the issues Montana’s plan does not address are handling any spilled diesel fuel resulting from thousands of truck trips through the area, concern from WYDOT about maximum load weights and environmental permitting required for staging dozens of heavy trucks near a Shoshone National Forest campground.
Though the U.S. Forest Service supports cleaning up the contaminated mine waste, Montana DEQ’s plan “is going to have impacts on us that have not been addressed,” said Terry Root, Wapiti district ranger for the Shoshone National Forest.
The plan calls for hauling up to 35 double-trailer loads every weekday June 1 – Sept. 15, which concerns WYDOT officials because the road is particularly vulnerable to damage until it dries after spring thaws.
“Mother nature is going to tell us when we can haul on that road,” said Ron Huff, a district maintenance engineer for WYDOT. “If we have a late spring, it may not be until July 1, or it may be July 15.”
Huff also objected to a special permit contractors plan to use that would allow for overweight loads to be hauled during a temporary, one-year window.
“We would not support that at all. We feel that if we allow overweight loads, that road will suffer tremendously,” he said.
“I’m adamantly opposed to that (permit) for safety reasons as well,” said Wyoming Highway Patrol Capt. Ed Peterson.
Peterson said he planned to focus on motorist safety along the route.
Federal law prohibits commercial trucking through Yellowstone, and the cleanup project does not meet criteria for a superintendent-issued exemption, said park spokesman Al Nash.
The only other route, over the 10,974-foot Beartooth Pass and along the Beartooth Highway, has even more switchbacks and steep grades.
WINDING ROUTE
One portion of the Chief Joseph route climbs nearly 2,000 feet in two miles along a series of tight switchbacks to the top of Dead Indian Pass, at 8,051 feet above sea level.
“These trucks are going to be going along slowly, about 22 mph, and Mom and Pop are coming up with their motor homes,” Peterson said. “They’re going to discover two things at 8,000 feet: they have no power and they can’t pass.”
The trucks and two trailers that make up each rig will stretch 97 feet from front to rear axle, and may leave the mill site as often as every 20-30 minutes between 7 a.m. – 7 p.m., according to the haul plan.
Nev Hardin, a trucker who drove a similar rig in 2002-03 during the New World Mining District cleanup around Cooke City, said that project was accomplished without incident, but it wasn’t easy.
Hardin and other drivers hauled up to 40 loads of gravel each day from Ralston over Dead Indian Pass, but “it was tough,” he said.
“We had a number of drivers that simply did not want to drive that road,” he said, adding, “all the concerns I’ve heard tonight about safety are valid.”
Childers and others said their preference would be to move all the contaminated tailings to the new repository. But Montana planners say seismic concerns allow for only about 80 percent of the tailings to be safely stored there.
Park County Commissioner Dave Burke said more than two dozen potential alternative repository sites were considered by the Forest Service, and other private mining claims exist throughout the area.
“Is there any possibility one of those sites could store the 20 percent you want to haul over the Chief Joseph?” Burke asked.
“If we can find a better way to do this and make sure we get those tailings, that material, out of the flood plane and get it stored — if we can find a better way to do that than hauling it 350 miles to Montana, we will do that,” Opper said.
Planners said they would ask Forest Service officials about using alternative sites previously deemed unsuitable for storing the full amount of tailings, but that might safely hold the remaining 20 percent.
Montana officials said that regardless of what final haul plan is developed, they will remain focused on removing the tailings from near Soda Butte Creek, a move that would benefit not just Montana, but also Yellowstone, Wyoming and the region.
“If this were easy, it wouldn’t have taken all these years” to find a solution, Nash said.
This feature originally appeared on WyoFile.com, and independent, nonprofit news service focused on the people, places and policy of Wyoming.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
Fast forwarding to the present, the State of Montana acquired the 30 acre private MacLaren tails from the EPA, who had sorta " foreclosed" on the current owners and forced them to relinquish the claims or pay to reclaim the site outright. Montana bought the MacLaren outright. Now what ?
Montana DEQ developed a plan to reclaim the MacLaren tha did NOT involve any of the waste leaving the site. Even as late as 2007 there was an alternative to move some of the treated waste a short distance to make it easier to build a more geotechincally suitable repository for the reclaimed waste on site...20 percent moved, 80 percent reengineered in place. However, the Gallatin National Forest and Montana DEQ realy do not like each other and hardly get along, and no agreement was forthcoming on a suitable second repository near the MacLaren. It was a classic turf battle spiced with personnal conflicts.
The plan causing controversy today came about when the price of gold skyrocketed, and it became theoretically feasible to haul it to a distant smelter ---in MOntana but not without passing thru Wyoming---and extract more gold in dollars than it cost to haul. If you accept that M-DEQ was just trying to find a means to neatly resolve the situation of having too much waste to re-engineer safely on site and no practical or political alternative , then quit reading now and start griping.
If, however, you are of the mind that share that Montana DEQ was ( a) telling the Gallatin Forest to go cimb a tree, we're gonna do it witout you , thumb to nose , and ( B) make some serious money now that gold is skyrocketing while we do this, just because we can ... then keep reading.
Montana DEQ writes the rules for regulating mine waste , and enforces same . The same agency is doing what no commercial or private entity could do in the last 140 years: successfully and profitably haul out a marketable quantity of gold from Cooke City, taking it straight to a smelter and minesite that they also regulate and permit. That minesite and smelter is scheduled to " sunset" and cease oeprations in a few years. It's hard to say whose idea it was to give Golden Sunight-Barrick Gold one last hurrah and 65,000 tons of glittery mine tailings to process at a profit---did the MDEQ approach the Golden Sunlight mine, or was it the other way around Does it matter? The State of Montana is now in the gold business. And that has a huge stench to it.
There is absolutely no environmental gain for Wyoming here, beyond the foofy assertion that cleaning up a creek that heads inside Montana and flows into Yellowstone Naitonal Park ---a foreign country and entity often hostile to Wyoming policies and an entity we have little management authority over or even shared values). To say the MacLaren cleanup is beneficial to Wyoming is a red herring.
There is also no positive economic gain for Wyoming if this hauling occurs: no jobs, no taxes, no revenue. In fact , the economics are all decidedly negative to Wyoming. In many ways. So t s only natural that Wyoming is resistant to having a Montana state agency commandeer a rpecious scenic corridor in order to exploit a trumped up gold scheme for Montana's gain at great cost to Wyoming, in dollars as well as intangible values such as disruption of tourism and a few dozen other real considerations.
Having said all this, the only reasonable course for Montana DEQ to take at this point is to revert to original plans and do no interstate hauling of money waste whatsoever. That course is truely in both state's interests, and the public's interest.
Leave all your mine waste in Montana and use your expertise and mojo to clean it up as best you can.
Not reported in this article was my questioning of Montana DEQ on th epoint of price of gold vs. expense of hauing. I got Opper to admit that if gold suddenly dropped to $ 700 an ounce from where it is now, roughly double that , then Montana would NOT be able to justify hauling it anywhere and they'd have to resort to leaving it up there. Having admitted that much , it is obvious that Montana DEQ can belay the hauling altogether and work the entirety of the MacLaren cleanup there on site. AFter all, that's where the mine waste came from ...the MacLaren open pit mine up in Fisher Creek inside the Noranda Crown Butte reclamation area.
It's only fair and proper that Montana clean up its own mess without burdening or impacting Wyoming. Besides the fact their is no guarantee that their gold hauling scheme is viable or without risk , being 8-10 times more costly per ton handled if hauled versus re-engineered in or near the MacLaren tailing site.
I'm sorry , but the Treasure State is going to have to forego its political DNA and ignore its state motto " Oro y Plata" ( gold and silver) and do the right thing here. Leave the MacLaren gold-bearing waste up there and just clean it up...
Does Montana DEQ have a conscience? Can they be innoculated against Gold Fever ? We'll see , when they take that step back.
It's not always about the money. In this case, money is the worst possible reason to do an unnecessary and problematic piggyback project. The glare of Gold blinds some folks. Should a state agency be in the gold business at all when no private company could succeed at it in 140 years when there was NO regulation and everything was market driven without restraint?
Bad idea.