Liberty Is A unifying Message.

Ron Paul For All !!!

When I look at the disastrous results of the past seven years and at how the wounds inflicted by the actual attacks on our country were so horribly magnified and multiplied by the incompetent and corrupt response of our own government, I just can't bring myself to support another Texan, for anything, for at least a while. If the people of Texas, including Ron Paul, had any sense, sensitivity, humility, or shame at all, they would all, every one of them, just stay home, stay quiet, and let somebody else have a fair turn at repairing the damage done by Texas' most recent "contribution' to America. They don't have to stay home and quiet forever, just for a little bit, long enough to let somebody else have a chance instead of Texans hogging the ball and screwing up the play continuously without anybody else getting a turn.

Wow, that is incredibly biased and prejudiced of you Mike, to assume that because George W. Bush has been a bad President, anyone else from Texas would be a bad President too! Tell me, do you feel the same way about Ivy League schools, since Bush went to Yale? So, any one who attended Yale or Harvard, like say, Clinton, or Obama should get a chance to get in the game either, right?

You probably don't know this, but the Republican Party in Texas has actually backed candidates against Ron Paul in his own district several times. Ron has been elected by the same people 10 times to Congress.

He has been against this war since before it began. Ron has never voted for higher taxes. Ron has never voted for an unbalanced budget. Ron has never voted himself a pay raise. Ron Paul is a man of his word. He is NOTHING like George W. Bush.

It hasn't just been the Bush family; Neil is also a prime example of a waste of skin. It has also been the damage resulting from the influence of Armey, Gramm, DeLay, and so many others; but, it also truly has nothing to do with one party or the other; it isn't even just about politics; Edward Abbey wrote eloquently about the culture and mindset nurtured down in Texas and the damage that has resulted and that was long before the current situation. At a deeper level, it isn't just about Texas, Texans, and the Texas way of thinking haven't turned out to be so bad for America. I just think that it is bad to have one part of the country, Texas or California or New York or wherever, hog things for too long. I am very familiar with Ron Paul; he is deeply, deeply, deeply a part of the Texan way of thinking; and I believe that we need a little bit of a change from that pattern. Texas is not the only state in the union; we need to give somebody else a chance. We need a change and, with all due respect, Ron is small change.

Since you mentioned Yale and Harvard, I look at the fact that George W. Bush has degrees from those institutions, apparently business training from Harvard. I look at how he turned out, his ethics, his drunken partying, his dodging even the guard service that he used to dodge military service, his incredible failure in the oil business even with his father propping him up, the way he allowed his party to put him into office through vote tampering in Florida, his lack of any success on any front while in office, his inability to speak for even a few moments without humiliating the country, and the obvious lack of intelligence and education that all of the above indicate. In this context, the only conclusion that I can reach is that both Yale and Harvard must be culpable for allowing a young man to cheat his way through to degrees that he obviously did not earn and did not deserve and that both universities, prestigious reputations or not, should have their accreditations investigated and possibly even pulled for allowing that to happen.

George W. Bush isn't a Texan.

Come out of denial...

Police officers have better things to do such catch murders, rapists, and child molesters. What two consenting adults voluntarily agree do in privacy is none of the government’s business and a complete waste of our tax dollars and the limited resources of our police departments.

Comparing Ron Paul to GW is like comparing Ghandi to Stalin. Ron Paul is for a reduction in government while neo-conservatives like GW are for expanding the fed gov. I challenge anyone to take the 5 minutes to read http://www.RonPaul2008.com and look under issues. I know that most Missoula citizens appreciate freedom of choice and would truly be engaged by his philosophy of reduced federal government and expanded civil liberties. I am willing to discuss any of the issues you come across and I can take the time to explain it to you (or debate if you feel the urge...)