ADDRESS AMERICA'S NO. 1 CONSERVATION ISSUE
No Child Left Inside
Let's spend some tax dollars on something that really counts, helping the "screen generation" connect with nature.By Bill Schneider, 6-11-09
![]() |
|
| Two of Bill's grandkids enjoying Avalanche Lake in Glacier National Park. Photo by Marnie Schneider. | |
Something happened, back on Earth Day 2009, that didn’t get nearly the fanfare it deserved.
Citing the critical need to improve environmental education across the country, Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) and Congressman John Sarbanes (D-MD) introduced House and Senate versions of the “historic” No Child Left Inside Act of 2009. If passed, it would mark the first environmental education legislation to pass Congress in more than 25 years.
And long overdue, I might add.
“Passing the No Child Left Inside Act is a key step in improving the quality of our children’s education and preparing them for the complex challenges of the future workforce,” Senator Reed said in a press release.
“Environmental education must be a part of the formal pre-K-12 education system if we are to fully prepare students to become lifelong stewards of our natural resources and compete in a green economy,” Congressman Sarbanes added.
The bill primarily authorizes new funding ($500 million over five years) for states to provide higher-quality, environmental education and to support outdoor learning activities. Similar bills died a silent death at the end of the Bush Administration.
Now, though, this might have enough political tailwind behind it to advance it through a new, blue Congress. The primary promoter of the legislation is the No Child Left Inside Coalition (NCLIC), a massive combine of 1,300 conservation and education nonprofits representing over 50 million people. Adding even more energy to the effort is a long list of co-sponsors, 10 senators and 38 representatives, including Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) and Representatives Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), Jared Polis (D-CO), and David Wu (D-OR).
NCLIC describes the Act as a “non-partisan effort,” but that is, regrettably, a push. Out of 50 sponsors, 48 are Democrat. Also regrettably, Republicans have already panned it as wasteful spending and a way to spread environmental propaganda through the public school system, setting up another partisan fight in Congress.
The Act is an outgrowth of the movement started by Richard Louv, author of a best-selling book called Last Child in the Woods, where he describes the dramatic decline in our children’s ability to connect with nature because of what he described as Nature Deficit Syndrome. (Click here to read an earlier commentary about the subject.)
Since the book was released, Louv has been on a full-time speaking tour, and many conservation groups have prioritized efforts to provide more outdoor activities and environmental education for our “screen generation.” Recruitment into most outdoor activities has fallen, as has membership in many outdoor and conservation groups. Outdoor equipment manufacturers have joined the chorus of the concerned because declining interest in outdoor activities clearly translates into lower sales of most outdoor gear.
Louv blames a variety of lifestyle factors for the striking decline in the amount of time kids spend outdoors, chief among them fear among parents over child predators we heard or read about almost every day--even though, interestingly, there has been no increase in the number of abductions, but a spectacular increase in media coverage of those we have.
This result of the decline is obvious. Kids stay inside and play electronic games, watch television or use computers--anything, it seems, with a screen--and don’t go outdoors, even to the city park, to experience nature.
The long-term impact is fewer grown-up children connected to nature and willing to work to protect it. The consequences of this are staggering, and the No Child Left Inside Act is an important step--but hardly the only step--to reversing the trend, so take a moment and contact your senator or representative and urge him or her to support its passage. Yes, it’s extra tax dollars, but a $100 million per year seems like pocket change compared to the many billions Congress has been devoting to Wall Street bailouts and endless wars for the past nine years.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
This is an incredible program and you are right, it got too little of the attention it deserved.
Oh, for the old days of staying outside all day until our parents FORCED us to go inside!
I'm not a parent, but here are a couple suggestions based upon some of the work I do:
Get kids to walk to school. I realize that is the "scarey" part for parents, but organize walking buses where the chaparones trade off along safe routes.
Work with your cities to eliminate single use zoning. Many jurisdiction have either development and parks or open space. Unfortunatly the open space gets pushed to the edges of town, not integrated into it where it is within easy walks of residents.
I would back off, but for some reason Skinner is intent on denying he is a hack.
I saw your comment on the park fee column, and thanks for doing it. I had this story in the works for a month or so, waiting for an opening. Actually, sort of old news, I guess, since I should have done it on Earth Day. I heard Richard Louv and the Outdoor Writers conference a few years ago, and wrote a column on it. See the link in the above article.
Bill
Kids used to belong to 4-H, Scouts, Campfire, and other kids organizations, most somewhat associated with school, service groups, and churches. In our drive for secular purity, we have managed to kick those organizations out of schools, but have failed to replace their time with kids and a replacement program.
We have had environmental, outdoor education, for a half century or more. It is just now those field trips of old are looked upon as indoctrination by natural resource abusers. But the litigators of the environment never replaced what they have protected us from. It is a political problem. And one that has stifled education and outdoor fun for kids. Maybe kids are in front of the screen by intent. Maybe they can be converts without visiting the great green cathedral. Or can we call it that anymore?
I proposed a rethinking of the bill, and a 100% bill either way is partisan and shameless, especially when it comes to a mandated education curriculum. What you you say if the legislature in Idaho mandated a abstinence only education in Idaho? I can guarantee that only one side would support that. I wouldn't, so which side am I on?
Also, you can throw stones all you want posting under a pen name, but I write face to face. Friends of mine, who disagree with me on many issues, read this site all the time. I am more than willing to take that heat, are you?
I too post to the Statesman, but under a pen name. I haven't been on there much recently except Rocky Barker's blog.