commentary
Palin Doesn’t Know What She Doesn’t Know
“Class is on the inside,” said my middle-class mother.By Jill Kuraitis, 9-16-08
“What do you make of the election?”
“I don’t want to talk about it,” I say crabbily.
“Talk me down from my panic about Sarah Palin.”
What am I, a political therapist?
“Can’t help you; I’m on the ceiling too,” I say.
“Why haven’t you written about Palin on New West?”
“Can’t face it. Too much horror to sort out. Shocked denial that anyone could approve of her. Passionate need to drive around with a loudspeaker on the roof shouting ‘ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME?’”
Writing about Palin is like a room that’s so messy you can’t clean it up because once you get started you realize it’s five days of around the clock work so you just continue to wallow in the mess, even though you’re miserable about it.
It takes a lot of energy to sustain this level of outrage, but it’s too important to let the energy go.
Analysis of the audacity of McCain’s decision to choose a running mate with the audacity to think she is qualified to be president is easy to find. Feminist analysis is everywhere. Information on her history and background, quotes, facts, scandal, corruption, jokes and videos are posted and reported by the minute. My head has been spinning since the day her choice was announced.
I finally decided to just write about how I feel.
My first impression was that she was exactly the kind of woman I can’t stand. I couldn’t stand her in high school, either. She was the head cheerleader who got there by bullying others and having her mother pull strings. She was the girl who secretly tortured other girls by starting rumors about them, but remained impossible to catch. She was the girl who would be your best friend one day, then turn on you the next and use your confidences against you. She was the girl who would complain to teachers about her grades and fight for every possible recognition, deserved or not, because she had to win. Winning was everything.
Sarahs are out only for themselves. It’s not what they can achieve; it’s what they can get by achieving it.
Oh, she was smart, although not the smartest. She was talented, personable, energetic. She was pretty, although there were prettier. She could be one of the girls or one of the boys. There would always be a hubbub around her; always a drama, because she liked it that way. She’d go through boyfriends like Kleenex, discarding them when someone better came along.
Most teachers would think she was wonderful: a class leader, an achiever – except perhaps one of your favorite teachers, who would see through Sarah and somehow let you know he was onto her.
But many mothers would know about Sarah from their daughters, and talk among themselves. Sarah’s mother was either oblivious, or worse: complicit. Having now raised a daughter, I know mothers like that. They had been Sarahs, too.
When you’re a girl who is not a Sarah, you can’t express these things, because people say “you’re just jealous.” And of course, they are partly right. Sarah didn’t have to work much for her recognition, and things we wanted seemed to just fall into her lap.
But some of us had mothers who knew the “things” that seemed to fall in Sarah’s lap were obtained using moral corruption. Our moms guided us to real achievement and supported us through the Sarahs, letting us know we were right - that she really was beneath us - and that we were worth a hatful of gold more than she. In the end, our mothers told us, we would hold our heads high and thank god we weren’t Sarahs. We would turn out to be strong, contributing women: scholars, leaders, honest workers, loyal friends, feeders of the poor, fighters for justice, gardeners of the earth.
While some people admire Sarah Palin for bagging a moose, we admire our friends who saved the homeless shelter or taught a young immigrant to read or registered 400 people to vote, and we spend our moose-hunting time tutoring kids and teaching Sunday school and trying to save things, instead of shooting them.
“Class is on the inside,” said my middle-class mother.
See, that’s the thing about Sarah Palin. Yes, it’s tacky to name your boys Track and Trig – which are actually dog’s names, in my opinion - but that’s not important, only funny.
But what Palin lacks on the inside isn’t funny at all.
Though I haven’t been a governor, I consider myself slightly better equipped than she to be vice-president. I’m educated at a better institution. My knowledge of history and world affairs surpasses hers. I’m betting my familiarity with recent legislation, proposals, and political philosophies beats hers. I grew up with a father who fought in four wars and have a son just home from the Middle East. I’ve lived among all kinds of people – left and right, black and white, rich and poor, rural and urban, educated and uneducated.
Despite those things, I know I am not qualified to be vice president – not even close. If some “older gentleman” called me up and offered me the VP spot on a ticket I would fall over laughing.
That’s what Sarah Palin should have done, and that she did not is something I cannot get over; something I cannot forgive, and it says something about her which is fundamental.
We’ve endured eight years of a president who also thought he was qualified; a man who has spent his eight years ruining the land that I love.
Sarah Palin is even less qualified. That she doesn’t know it is the scariest thing of all.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.



Comments
I don't know if you have read 'Nixonland', but Perlstein lays out how, ever since he won some college election, Nixon aways played the Orthogonians (the regular kids, the unpopular, the offensive linemen, the nerds) against the Franklins (the jocks, cheerleaders, quarterbacks, preppies). Republicans have run against the 'Franklins' ever since: the so-called liberal media, the East Coast, "San Francisco" values
They tried to mold Palin into an Orthogonian. That's right. Cheerleader. Beauty Queen. Heather. Mean Girl. Orthogonian.
It was dead right off the bat. Her RNC speech was nasty and dripping with contempt for regular people.
Know how out of touch Republicans are? They thought "Hockey mom" was the new soccer mom. Do you know why soccer mom's become soccer moms? It is because when your kid signs up for soccer, you go buy them cleats. In 95% of the country, playing hockey means you buy hundreds if not thousands of dollars in equipment; then you are roped into paying for travel and all that.
In Casper, Wyoming saying you are a hockey mom is the same as saying your husband is a doctor or oilman. Everyone who wasn't a hockey mom hated the hockey moms--cuz they were the same clique of sniping mean girls since high school--and they still think they are better than everyone else.
When I heard her initial speech, I predicted that she would tank because she was so snide and mean and sarcastic.
The "small town" stereotype she represents is that of the holier than thou gossip and goodie-two-shoes neighbor whose kids are in more sports than everyone else, always makes underhanded comments about your browning lawn (she has a landscaper), and calls the cops on your barking dog even though hers is the most obnoxious (and neglected) on the block.
Sarah Palin
"Yecch"
Alfred E. Neuman
Your opinion seems spiteful for somebody you have never met. Sarah put herself in the spotlight, so she is fair game for some criticism. I don't know why you needed to drag Sarah's mother into this. Can you prove how Sarah's mother was a parent?
PS- How do we as reader's know you went to a better instittution?
To prove my point, a partisan on the "other side" of the culture war responded above. She says "Your opinion seems spiteful... How do we as reader's know you went to a better instittution?"
This is precisely the kind of argument Palin, Limbaugh, and other warriors want us to be having.
The longer we play at the culture war game, the more we increase the possibility of losing this election.
I believe we must ignore Palin and stop feeding the culture war frenzy if we want to win this election.
You can't make it through the filtering process without that. But lord help us, it isn't enough to qualify someone.
George W. Bush.
'nuff said.
She's done a fine job of milking the federal government and the resource extraction industry to satisfy the vast majority of the residents of her little town, and her sparsely populated state. How wonderful that all the citizens of Alaska are getting $1200 kickbacks, ain't it?
Taking on big oil... reformer... oh but wait. Those $1200 checks are coming out of OUR pockets. Oil companies don't pay taxes, oil consumers do. So when we fill up with refined Alaska crude, part of the bill is for marketing Sarah.
With "reform" like that, who needs it?
To speculate about what kind of high-schooler Palin was, and criticize her on account of that speculation, is a stretch indeed! This reader draws the conclusion that high school was particularly dramatic for you, and maybe you didn't get invited to all the cool parties and stuff. Are you still smarting, all these years later, that you weren't part of the "in" crowd?
And many of the comments are equally lacking in substance.
- Criticizing her for her "hockey mom" reference? Did you ever consider that Hockey Moms are to Alaska what Soccer Moms are to the Lower 48? (Duh!)
- Her face appears to be "sneering" when she talks? WOW! That's some deep analysis! On par with Jill's "PHSPI" (Presumed High School Popularity Index) Analysis!
- Mike Gravel wanted to build a domed city in Alaska? What does THAT have to do with Palin?
You're obviously running as scared as Obama is at this point, Jill!
(By the way, I am NOT a drooling, knuckle-dragging McCain/Palin supporter. Just trying to keep a level head. And the substantive comments prior to my own are appreciated and noted.)
Quit frankly the thought of Ms. Palin sitting across the table from the likes of a Mahmoud Ahmadinejad chills me to the bone. Given McCains health issues and age Ms. Palin could in deed become the President of the United States. SCARY VERY SCARY.
Lame hokum bravado, bb.
lycobob: "thug"?! Did you have trouble with vocabulary at the U of I? (Nothing wrong with the university, I've got a couple of their degrees myself.)
It is quite possible to make accurate character judgments on minimal evidence. We do it all the time, and decide whether we want to get to know someone, move to the other side of the room, run away.
That's not to say that all minimally informed judgments are on the mark. Some people are better judges of character than others. Some people pay attention better than others.
The Republican Base that is so fired up about their attractive celebrity candidate is making plenty of their own judgments on scant evidence. We don't really know what it is that McCain saw in her, but clearly, unquestionably, indefensibly, it was more about winning the election than governing the country.
Sarah Palin deserves the benefit of the doubt in many respects, but her background, experience, and performance to date do not give us any reason to suppose she's capable of fulfilling the duties of Vice-President, much less President.
McCain's choosing such a running mate forces us to seriously question his judgment and capacity to govern as well. "Maverick" is one thing, "loose cannon" quite another.
It sounds to me as if you're quite mean spirited, presumptuous, and very scared of someone different than yourself. Obviously, you're ready to fight in whatever way for whom you want in office. For claiming to have superior knowledge, judgment, and education than Palin may have, you seem quite small minded with the way and the words you've chosen to present your frustration.
Maybe it's time to put the muck and slinging -as you've contributed to- aside. After reading your thoughts, it appears to me that perhaps 'Jill doesn't know what Jill doesn't know' and unfortunately, you're quite verbose about it. In fairness, your article appears of an opinion type, not much else, and thus the lack of any real substance. It's clear though to see what you are sowing in your garden - negativity. You represent part of the reason why democrats will have a hard time succeeding. Indeed, class is on the inside and shows through, sometimes quietly; some have it and some may never.
...and since you mention that you spend your "moose-hunting time" "...teaching Sunday school and trying to save things, instead of shooting them" (i.e. killing) in the same sentence... where does your Sunday school stand on life since you seem so concerned? Is it pro-choice or pro-life?
Hopefully, the debates will help to further elucidate the candidates' positions on the issues as well as concrete plans for how to effect changes they see needed, not just words. Hopefully, we can then make informed decisions on the candidates and the approaches they represent.
I'm just curious if the racist waffle mix that was selling at the so-called "Value Voters Summit" for 2+ days an attempt to "reach across the aisle" and stop all the partisan bickering. If it was, I think white sheets would work better.
http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2008/09/15/obama-waffles-creator-works-for-fox/
In the first two posts I made to this thread there are a variety of statements of fact and opinion. Use them as an example if you need one. Refute them if you like.
But if all you've got is name-calling, pack it in, you're wasting everyone's pixels.
As more and more information comes out and the truth of Sarah Palin is exposed, thinking people will see why she was such a poor choice as McCain’s running mate. One must approach the widely available info with an open mind and nonpartisan eye. If you can truly do so, you will see why she should not be in a position to be a heartbeat away from the presidency. I lived in Alaska for a very long time and was actively involved in community and politics. Sarah Palin angered and offended many within her first month in office and trashed a lot of really good people. She is not a friend of women, nor of those who are not white conservative evangelical Christians. Alaska is a most multi-cultural place, for all its small numbers in population. The jr. high my daughter attended had 100 different nationalities represented. Palin did not represent a great many of the residents of the state; maybe more in the town of Wasilla, because it is much smaller and much less diverse and they want to keep it that way. I truly love that state and the unique place that it is, and it has been difficult to watch what she has done there. The only change she brought to Alaska is it went from a good old boy network to a good old girl network. She is not good for Alaska and she will not be good for America. Her finger near any red buttons is truly a scary thought and she is scary because her views are even worse than GW's. And we all know what a wonderful job he has done!
One might judge from the "diversity" of delegates to the Republican National Convention that these are the "small town values" they're all so excited about maintaining.
Tribal politics, as it were.
Just stopping in to point out that I wrote, "Analysis of the audacity of McCain’s decision to choose a running mate with the audacity to think she is qualified to be president is easy to find. Feminist analysis is everywhere. Information on her history and background, quotes, facts, scandal, corruption, jokes and videos are posted and reported by the minute. My head has been spinning since the day her choice was announced.
I finally decided to just write about how I feel."
I did not intend to write in any of the above genres or formats, and said so. After reading the above, expecting "analysis, history, background, facts" is to ignore what I made clear were my intentions. And of course, this is an opinion column. Impossible to mistake it for anything else.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sundown_town
roseinmt, I need to clarify one thing you said. She was never given the name "Sarah Barracuda" by her basketball teammates. She is lying about that too. The Anchorage Daily News has the story:
http://www.adn.com/sarah-palin/story/525556.html
"To be honest, I'd never heard that name before," said Jackie Conn, Palin's backcourt mate who now lives in Anchorage. "I don't know if anyone actually called her that."
John McCain is a tired old rerun and Obama is too sold on himself but I could kind of live with either one of them, and Joe Biden seems about right for Vice President, but Palin? Give me a break, if I'm not from a small town and don't want thugs roaming the streets fully armed, and I don't happen to like the idea that if a daughter is raped by her uncle and she happens to get pregnant her body belongs to the state, then I am according to Sarah some sort of radical terrorist. I don't care where she are comes from, this idiot is bad news. And don't you dare say anything untoward about the pit bull that loves to dish it out and break knees, because that wouldn't be nice.
We're at about the tipping point, where 51% of people will reliably vote for the most shameless liar. Say the economy melts down, driven mostly by a refusal to regulate banking because doing so would reduce loans to people who can't pay them back and doing something like that would be attacked as racist, because racism, as everyone knows, is so widespread that anti-racism has become the new semiofficial religion of people who want to feel moral without making much personal sacrifice, and our politics is clogged with moralists who desperately need someone to blame as racists. . .
Will the people turn to those who caused the problem, begging them to do even more?
Sure, and more promises--and destructive policies--will be forthcoming. Palin's not ready to be president. But she's sure a blast of fresh air.
I don't understand why you would promote that we not be anti-racist. Doesn't that just leave us with being racist or at least apologetic and understanding of the racist mindset. I won't do that. Will you actually vote against McCain because he's white?
Millions of viewers found American Idol and Who Wants to be a Millionaire? to be a blast of fresh air too, I suppose.
Just because something grabs your attention doesn't mean it's a Good Thing.
I think of it as, you know, pointing out bona fide racism.