Who's Paying for the Signs?

Ravalli County Anti-Zoning Campaign Draws Scrutiny


By Robert Struckman, 10-22-08

 
 

Hot land politics and alleged campaign shenanigans in Ravalli County spurred Montana’s Commissioner of Political Practices to pay a personal visit yesterday, writes reporter John Cramer in the Ravalli Republic.

Before hearing concerns from locals, Commissioner Dennis Unsworth drove around and saw several campaign signs aimed at preventing zoning and streamside setback regulations. Unsworth said the signs seemed to avoid disclosing who paid for them. The state has four ongoing investigations about political practices in Ravalli County and fields more than a dozen complaints a day, Cramer reported.

The state’s most pressing investigation in Ravalli County concerns the Higher Ground Foundation, a nonprofit group that is urging voters to repeal the growth policy in an effort to prevent zoning and streamside setback regulations from being adopted later.

At issue is whether Higher Ground is a nonprofit educational group, as its officials say, or an organization formed to influence a ballot initiative, which also may be the case, judging from the group’s significant efforts to get county voters to reject zoning and other regulation at the polls this November. Commissioner Unsworth has asked the group to describe its broader educational efforts to prove that its purpose is not primarily political. It’s not clear how far the investigation will go before the election or how an eventual violation, if such is found, will play out in policy. For instance, Unsworth said the group might be fined, but nothing was said about whether a violation would discount the election results.

These points are not merely academic. Nonprofit educational groups don’t have to disclose their funding. Political issue groups do.

Funding sources are important, because sometimes an interest group will portray itself as an effort largely supported by the public when in reality it is bankrolled by a few individuals or a business. That was the case with a proposed WalMart Supercenter near Hamilton a few years ago. The company secretly spent $115,000 to repeal a zoning rule that kept it from building the store. (WalMart later decided against building a store there.)

Unsworth ruled that Ravalli County Citizens for Free Enterprise was a Wal-Mart front-group that violated financial reporting and record-keeping laws.

Ravalli County, one of Montana’s more conservative areas politically and one in which growth has been pell-mell, regularly sees controversy and sometimes actions beyond the pale.

“Land-use issues have a long history of being very contentious in Montana, but this is extraordinary,” Unsworth said, “I don’t know if there’s something in the water here, but I think it’s because of the level of growth and the interest by some parties.”



Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.

NEW WEST FEATURES                                                                 More>>

Advertisement

Comments

By Scot E., 10-22-08
By RockyMountainBen, 10-22-08
By Matthew Koehler, 10-22-08
By Niki Sardot, 10-22-08
By Fubar, 10-23-08
By Matthew Koehler, 10-29-08

Comment policy:

NewWest.Net encourages robust and lively, but civil participation from our readers. By posting here, you agree to the NewWest.Net terms of service. You agree to keep your comments on topic, respectful and free of gratuitous profanity. Contributions that engage in personal attacks, racism, sexism, bigotry, hatred or are otherwise patently offensive will be subject to removal.

Other than using a filter that scans for comment spam, we do not moderate contributions before they are posted and we do not review every thread, so we ask that you help us in keeping the discussions civil and appropriate. Please email info@newwest.net to notify us of comments that may violate these guidelines. Thanks for your help and cooperation. Click here for some tips on how to best interact on NewWest.Net.

Your Comment

Name

Email

Remember my name and email address.

Notify me of follow-up comments.

Advertisement