New West Blog
Report: Obama ‘Tacitly’ Supporting Bush-Era Environmental Policies
By Courtney Lowery, 6-17-09
![]() |
|
Sometimes, what you don’t do can be just as telling as what you do. In a report today the Chicago Tribune’s Jim Tankersley makes that case in detailing what Bush-era environmental policies the Obama administration is “backing” via inaction in the courts.
From the story:
“… five months after he entered the White House, Obama has done nothing to defend the so-called roadless protections in a court case that could soon decide their fate — tacitly maintaining the legal position staked out by the Bush administration, which tried to scrap the plan to curb construction of new roads in national forests.
Obama administration officials say they’re committed to roadless protections and are aggressively pursuing them through policymaking rather than in the courts. They say their actions in the “roadless” court case reflect legal tactics, not the real thrust of their policy.”
Tankersley also highlights drilling on the Roan Plateau as another example.
“As a junior senator from that state in 2008, Ken Salazar called the plan “the unsound product of an administration that has lost sight of the balance” between developing and conserving public lands. Now Salazar is interior secretary and negotiating with environmentalists and industry to settle a lawsuit challenging the leasing plan. His lawyers told a court this spring that the plan was legal.”
Click here for the entire story.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
As well, Obama has pledged to not use signing statements to create legislation, unless the issue in immediately dire. The legislation that would "curb construction of new roads" would then have to start the process of going through Congress. With such a bill, I would imagine it would have to be tacked on as a "rider" due to the party of NO. I could be wrong, but thats how the Owyhee protection had to go through.
So I'm wondering exactly what is your beef? The invisibility of the maneuvering, or that legislation hasn't been introduced, yet? The Democrats would have to introduce it, and I don't see many of those from the Wilderness states.
Face the facts..NREPA
IS
DEAD.
The thing about Obama is that he played the environuts like a fiddle during his campaign. He got all of you to finance his campaign letting you believe whatever fantasy world you could come up with on how he would govern.
The fact that he's not meeting the expectations of the obstructionist wing of the environmental community is not due to any fault of his own but instead of their own delusional expectations.
Bill is closer to reality pointing out that Obama has much bigger issues to deal with. I don't think that Obama doesn't care about public lands issues, but he certainly doesn't have time to give them much thought right now. Surely you've noticed that Salazar got appointed over someone like Carl Pope. Moderation and compromise seems to be the themes playing out which I'm sure is tough for certain obstructionist environmental groups to swallow.
To think that Obama would pull off a stunt like Clinton did with Grand Staircase at the end of his presidency is laughable. Grand Staircase of course is located in Utah where we might have dinosaurs roaming again before another Democrat is elected to be President. NREPA lands lie heavily in two states where Democrats are desperately trying to gain or maintain a small foothold. I'm not a political scientist but.......
If the issues are in the court, there is no reason to write up legislation that will pass court muster, yet. I thought that might be obvious to some, but evidently I assumed too much.
Try to get over it, okay?
If that means that in order to jumpstart the economy we still for a time need to immerse ourselves in activities which are questionably sustainable or beneficial within the long term context of desirable future conditions, well then that’s ok-for example as George Wuerthner just pointed out in his extremely well written and scientifically accurate piece on fire (and I’m sorry but if you know anything about the incredibly complex site and weather specific science of Fire Ecology you realize its a very valid assessment) many of these WUI thinning projects may very well offer little or no long term benefit towards protecting private property no matter how far or close to the interface they are because in certain extreme weather conditions EVERYTHING WILL BURN!-even creek bottom riparian zones. This is what happened in 2000 and 2003 when here in Western Montana we had infernos raging across everything from the driest most typically fire prone Ponderosa and Doug Fir habitat types (no surprise with fire return intervals that typically range from 5 to 35 years) all the way up to Subalpine Fir and even Mountain Hemlock Zones where fire return intervals are more on the order of 150-300 years -we even had creek bottom Cedar habitat in North facing slopes practically in the Alpine zone where avg. annual precip is 70 inches burn those years! So we know that a lot of these WUI projects may not accomplish much or may even be ecologically destructive BUT (this is where I respectfully part company with George and jump over to Bearbait and Skinners side)SO WHAT!
This country cannot afford the luxury of idealistic ecological integrity any more-not right now. I say fire up the saws and start slashing with as many WUI projects as possible, stream restoration and instead of just road obliteration -how about some well needed logging road maintenance so we can keep the few that are still usable as such. Quite simply any thing that will put any body to work within the context of something even just temporarily sustainable or slightly beneficial needs to be derived and executed NOW with all this supposed stimulus money. Who cares if 20 years from now we realize that a lot of these thinning projects really didn’t end up preventing catastrophic wildfire ,if during this critical current time period the projects at least put food on the table and some sort of employment stability in to the lives of the many who are desperately floundering, especially in rural areas. If by the grace of GOD ALMIGHTY this country ever recovers to any degree of its former wealth then we can again start talking about pipe dreams like NREPA(which is ecologically ethical for sure but has yet to be proven economically or socially) and the supposedly flourishing tourism based economy it would perpetuate through so much preservation. I think its highly unlikely that a lot of these RARE era road less areas are going to be significantly eroded by burgeoning development projects far and wide any time soon.
In the meantime unless your one of the lucky few who inherited a trust fund that wasn’t destroyed by Wall Street and the Bernie Madoff imitating scum of the earth, then you like me are probably a wee bit stressed about the direction the American dream seems to be currently headed. We are manly in survival mode at this point and we cannot afford to endlessly bicker, debate and litigate over every last detail of every ecological policy and project. The age of analysis paralysis has got to end in favor of green-minded, collaborative tinkering and exploration. The whole concept of eco restoration is by and large still waiting to be pioneered and proven with much more long term data and site analysis necessary to truly know what kind of “desired future conditions” we are truly capable of steering and sustainably yielding through our activities-and we will surely have both failures and successes along the way, but we need to be DOING rather than just more arguing.
I would say its much too early to tell what Obama’s environmental legacy will become but I’m quite certain it will be a vast improvement and much less short-sighted than the un mitigated disaster that became the standard operating, stick your head in the sand and pretend its not happening procedure of the previous administration. Extreme environmentalists need to settle down and be happy that at least things are heading much more in favor of a universal green-minded existence being derived in this country and globally than ever before in history, even if it is out of back against the wall desperation, at this point. And last but not least I wholeheartedly concur with good ol Bearbait about the fact that the male population of the world and Catholics especially need to become much more proficient in the usage of prophylactics (I learned that in the Blues Brothers movie remember?) aka condoms and even spermicide as it is friggin OVERPOPULATION that is the main problem with all of this shit! I really doubt Jesus wants your unwanted child born into generations of perpetual poverty, my dear Catholic brethren so enjoy scintillating sex with your wife often –just please do it with a value –pack size box of Trojans perpetually by your bedside and teach the sons you already have to do the same.
The country needs jobs and working people...and not just making trails for the exclusive use of hikers either...real jobs producing food, energy, roads, houses.
you really don't understand the theories behind finite resources and cost of extraction in regards to fossil fuels, do you? Instead, it is so much easier to place blame on a group that you don't like. Education is such a terrible thing to waste, don't you think?
Sustainable government finance should be the first concern of any thinking environmentalist. If a healthy environment is the birthright of the children of our children's kids, well, so is a financially healthy nation.
But how can the administration feign concern for the long term sustainability of the planet when they propose a bloated government that cannot be sustained?
Sustainable lifestyle might start at home, but it's something that the government could render moot if it doesn't finance itself the same way.
Anything he can do to wreck our economy he will get to soon enough.
Today he is wrecking our economy with Cap and (tax) Trade, tomorrow he is going to wreck our health care system.
You all don't want America to lead the world, well you will soon get your wish!