Roundup: GMOs Here and Abroad, Subsidy Cuts Coming and Best Small Food Towns
Which Western towns would you name as best small towns for food?By Courtney Lowery Cowgill, 4-14-11
![]() |
|
| This month's issue of Audubon tackles the GMO issue, including a look at these genetically engineered HoneySweet plums. Photo courtesy of the USDA. | |
Genetically modified food has gone from being a niche issue to a full-blown mainstream topic of concern and the national media is taking note.
The latest in a string of national publications tackling the issue is this month’s issue of Audubon magazine in which writer Alisa Opar sets out to detail the “promise and peril” of genetically modified food. Overall, it’s a good read and while it misses depth in some parts, it makes up in context and history.
Here’s the nut:
What’s certain is that plants and animals awaiting approval hold both promise and peril. The promise is intriguing. Monsanto’s drought-tolerant corn, for instance, might withstand the drier conditions climate change is expected to cause. Then there’s the South Dakota biotech company whose cattle are resistant to mad cow disease; an “Enviropig” that produces low-phosphorous manure (which could reduce water pollution from industrial hog farms); and another pig that produces omega-3, so consumers could get their dose of heart-healthy fatty acids from bacon instead of fish oil or flaxseed.
Yet no one knows exactly what will happen when transgenic products are released into the environment. After decades of dependence on Roundup, an herbicide applied to transgenic crops ranging from sugar beets to cotton, it has come to light that one of the world’s most popular pesticides is lethal to amphibians.
Meanwhile, the European Union is inching closer to allowing outright bans on genetically modified crops. According to this report from Reuters, EU lawmakers on Tuesday that EU countries should be allowed to ban GMO crops out of environmental concern. And:
EU countries should also be free to ban GM crops to protect local plants, habitats and alternative farming practices such as organic production, the European Parliament’s influential environment committee said in a vote in Brussels.
In Canada too, the government is taking a (small) stand against GMO. The Epoch Times reports that
Canada’s National Research Council has decided that it will not research GMO wheat:
The government agency said in a statement that developing GMO wheat is will not be one of its objectives, “We will be developing a number of tools that will be used to reduce the breeding cycle, increase yield, and adapt to climate stresses. GMO varieties are not contemplated at this time.”
FARM SUBSIDY CUTS
The Wall Street Journal this week laid out just how threatened farm subsidies are. Which is to say: Very. From Bill Tomson and Siobhan Hughes’ report:
A group of conservative lawmakers has set its sights on these direct payments, and even farm-state Democrats who like the program say high crop prices make the outlays of about $5 billion a year harder to justify. Recently, the National Corn Growers Association, an industry lobby group, urged Congress to revamp the program, fearing it would be eliminated altogether.
THE ART OF COOKING AND BOOKING
Author Elizabeth Helman Minchilli makes a strong case this week on The Atlantic for ditching the search engine when you’re looking for dinner ideas and cracking open a cookbook instead.
SAFE, HEALTHY AND JUST FOOD
The United Farmworkers of America and the the Bon Appetit Management Company Foundation have released a new study on the state of farmworker issues.
Civil Eats this week digs into the results and finds a grim picture.
Here’s a link to the full report.
NO SLAUGHTER HOUSE, NO LOCAL MEAT
The Bay Citizen and the New York Times put out a nice piece this week digging into the shortage of slaughterhouses in California and how that is stymieing the local food movement in the Bay Area.
And, if you’re interested (and have a strong stomach) this video piece from Liza de Guia of Food Curated (a cool site, by the way) tells a nice story of a local butcher in Hartwick, N.Y.
WANT ANOTHER COOKIE? GO AHEAD, IT’S ORGANIC!
According to research from Cornell University graduate student Jenny Wan-chen, detailed in this piece in the Los Angeles Times, people think organic food has fewer calories, more fiber and less fat.
BIG FOOD STORIES, SMALL FOOD TOWNS
Two interesting ranking stories this week in the food sphere:
The site ecosalon details the most important food stories of 2011 so far. On the list: how foodies can save the green movement, Mark Bittman’s arrival on the New York Times op-ed pages and farmworker justice.
The Daily Meal this week honored ”9 Great Small Food Towns,” including Ithaca, N.Y., Evanston Illl, Lawrence, Kan., and Asheville, N.C.
(It was a disappointment to see no Western towns on the list. Boulder? Missoula? Santa Fe? All good choices. Maybe it’s time we did an index of our own. Suggestions?)
-----------------
Courtney Lowery Cowgill is a writer and editor (formerly of these pages) who also runs Prairie Heritage Farm, a small farm in Central Montana. She and her husband grow vegetables, turkeys, ancient and heritage grains and sometimes a little ruckus. As a farmer and writer, she works on and follows food and agriculture issues closely and each week, rounds up the top stories on the web in this arena for New West. Have an ag story you think should be included in next week’s roundup? You can reach Courtney at courtney@newwest.net.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
The failure can be brought about by insects and other pests, and that gives rise to pesticide use, which has increased the world food supply ten fold or more. Competing growth is controlled to some extent by herbicides, of which Roundup is but one of thousands. Lack of water at appropriate times is mitigated by irrigation whenever possible, much of it in the West and subsidized by the Federal Bureau of Reclamation. In my farm management, I use all the tools I have at my disposal. And I am not intellectually willing, to some extent, to use them willy nilly. Farm chemicals cost a lot of money, and you use as few as possible.
Last year I went through a painful process of how to deal with the newly introduced Spotted wing drosophila fruit fly from Japan and northern Asia. That fly lays its eggs, one or two at a time, in ripening soft fruits. The resulting maggot puts out a couple of snorkles for gas exchange, and begins to consume the fruit from the inside out. The very piercing of the fruit skin by the serrated ovipositor introduces bacteria inside the fruit. They lay about 300 eggs a life time, which can be as long as 280 days. I caught some in traps in February, after a night in the teens followed by a cold sunny day. It takes from 6 to 13 days from egg to maggot to pupae and emerging fly. We can have as many as a dozen generations a season from one fly. There are zero known predators for the fly in any life stage. There is no sex attractant that we can use to attract flies to a trap in droves. There is no known directed predator from Asia to release here to kill them, like a specific wasp or some such similar critter. The result: I lost years of Integrated Pest Management insect populations because the particular insecticides registered to my crop are less than 5 that will allow you to spray and pick in the same year. And none of them are specific to the flies. They are broad spectrum insecticides. They kill any insects. I hated using them. And still do. "Nuking" insects is just not in my makeup, personally. But I have to wear the hat of a person paid to save the crop.
I was and am, personally, not in favor of using insecticides. IPM works for insects with a predator. My most damaging were caterpillars from moths, for which I used Bt sprays , which are bacteria that interrupt digestion in caterpillars or "worms." Then there were aphids, which suck the life out of plants. I was in constant conflict with crop advisors about spraying aphids, which are know virus vectors. I would tell them it took a lot of aphids to attract their predators, and they will come. And they always did, and we went from infestation to having trouble finding one in a week's time. Billions of aphids died each year in one week. Were consumed. Now I kill them and any other insects, with sprays I need to be afraid of personally, all to control the SWD fruit fly and have a blueberry crop to sell.
So my dilemma was that I was not of the mind to spray for SWD. Just went against my grain. But I nor anyone else, had an answer to SWD which were by now firmly entrenched. I was just an employee whose mission was to keep my bosses financially stable. I had to do whatever it took to ensure a crop of maggot free berries suitable for the fresh market. It would be unethical of me NOT to spray. And I still don't like to, or want to, but have to. In no way do we break any laws or regulations. We use only EPA and FDA approved chemistries. By the label. No more or no less. I can still hate that I do it. But I still have to do it.
However, if there is anyone out there who would pay my boss about a million bucks a year to not spray, he would consider it. Nobody is going to hold their breath.
If you want relatively cheap, abundant, good quality foods, with shelf appeal and shelf life, chemicals will be a part of that supply. At this point in time. organic does not pay enough more to make up for loss of shelf life, berry size, crop size and expense to even have a crop. If it did, we would be working on having an organic label. IN the meantime, we try to be as sustainable as we might be. But not spraying for SWD cannot sustain the farm and the investment in costs and forgone years of production of anything on that land while we grew plants to a size where a crop could be taken off, and then another ten years to bush maturity, which we have reached on half our acres.
Ever in crisis, we are all hand picked, and we do wonder if we have enough pickers left out there in the welfare state. Border crossing arrests are way down due to the recession and no migrant labor moving around for fear of deportation. Our farm is 60 miles from a major metro area, and the only non Hispanic pickers we ever see are a small group of SE Asians. Never an African American. Never a Native American. Never an Anglo American. The SE Asians are making money to send a kid to university, and the Hispanics are following a cultural working ethic of agricultural labor. The rest are above doing piece work with a minimum wage guarantee. We have one Hispanic family (middle aged mom and dad, a grandmother, and two kids in their early twenties) who routinely make, as a family, more than $400 a day. The owner pays their gas to get here. The family will make around $25,000 in two months of picking at our farm and one other. All of it on payroll checks with all the deductions. And then they go north to pick apples and pears in Washington. That is a work ethic and a family supporting themselves by picking crops. I am sure they get in 26 weeks of work, and are able to draw unemployment when work is not available. Of course they are the exception. This is the USA, where the two new guys on my kid's logging crew came from hundreds of miles away, having been out of work for months or a year or more. They are green, but passed the piss tests, and are able bodied and eager. That alone is not the norm today. My son is driving the crew bus because he is the only one who has a driver license and can be insured. He'd rather sleep in a seat while someone else drove. Much of America's youth is unemployable because of drug testing, felony records, and slothful lifestyles (seemingly can't get up and to work in the morning), and no high school diploma or satisfactory military record. The majority of ag jobs have no such screening or requirements. But we compete with welfare and selling drugs. And not well.