DRILLING DOWN ON DRILLING
Salazar Unveils Oil and Gas Reforms
The new reform package replaces Bush's 'anywhere, anyhow' drilling policy, Salazar says.By David Frey, 1-06-10
![]() |
|
| Photo from Flickr by Mike Disharoon and used here under creative commons license. | |
Taking aim at the Bush administration’s approach to oil and gas leasing, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar unveiled a slate of reforms on Wednesday intended to better protect land, water and wildlife and reduce the number of protests filed by environmental groups and others at odds with leasing decisions.
“The previous administration’s ‘anywhere, anyhow’ policy on oil and gas development ran afoul of communities, carved up the landscape, and fueled costly conflicts that created uncertainty for investors and industry,” Salazar said on Wednesday.
The package of reforms arose in part from an examination of controversial gas leases in Utah, many of which were close to national parks and archeological resources. After studying those parcels last year, Salazar removed many from leasing and required further studies for others.
The reform package won praise from some environmental and sportsmen’s groups but criticism from industry supporters who say the new rules will only bring further delays to companies already hit hard by falling fuel prices.
“Secretary Salazar’s misguided proposal couldn’t come at a worse time for this economy,” said Colorado state Rep. Josh Penry, a Republican from Grand Junction, where gas jobs have vanished from what had been a once-booming gas patch. “These rules will destroy jobs and reduce domestic energy production at a time when Colorado and America need a lot more of both.”
The reforms call for interdisciplinary reviews that look at site-specific considerations for individual leases, including in some cases, site visits to the individual parcels. They call for greater public involvement in individual lease sales and in developing area plans where intensive drilling is anticipated. While the rules will still allow industry to recommend lease areas, they will emphasize leasing in already-developed areas and call for careful planning in new areas.
The reforms also seek to limit the use of categorical exclusions, which fast-track leases on sometimes controversial sites.
“For too long, leasing has occurred with minimal thought given to the impacts on fish and wildlife, water resources, and hunting and fishing opportunity,” said Chris Wood, Trout Unlimited’s chief operating officer. His group called Salazar’s reforms a “good start, but said Interior needs to do more to rein in industry’s impacts on public lands.
“It’s a good start toward reining in what can only be described as unchecked oil and gas extraction that has already taken a toll on the important places for hunters and anglers in the West,” said Brad Powell, energy director for TU’s Sportsmen’s Conservation Project, but he said they fall short of more comprehensive reforms that are needed.
Salazar said the new rules will bring order and certainty to the leasing process. Industry groups have complained that leasing has become too bureaucratic and unpredictable, but Salazar said past practices too often left leases tied up in litigation for months.
In 1998, he said, just over 1 percent of gas leases on public land were protested. Ten years later, that number grew to 40 percent.
Salazar shrugged off criticism that the reforms would bog down industry. Of 43.6 million acres of federal land that have been leased, Salazar said, only 12 million acres are in production. Last year, the administration offered 9 million acres for leasing.
Follow David Frey on his Web site, www.davidfrey.me, and on Twitter, @davidmfrey.
“In the prior administration, the oil and gas industry essentially were the kings of the world,” he said. “Whatever they wanted to happen essentially happened. This department was essentially a handmaiden of the oil and gas industry. We brought that to an end because the resources the department oversees are resources that belong to the American taxpayer.”
The Independent Petroleum Association of Mountain States blasted what it called additional red tape that would slow down drilling.
IPAMS Director of Government Affairs Kathleen Sgamma called it a “bureaucratic command-and-control system in which government bureaucrats – rather than scientists with expertise in natural gas and oil development – dictate where energy development should occur.”
Follow David Frey on his Web site, www.davidfrey.me, and on Twitter.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
Rumor is, Salazar is being hooked for the vacancy now that Ritter has punched his clock. This sort of policy is just going to motivate the heck out of the Western Slope. Salazar sold himself as pragmatic, but this policy proves the sales pitch was just that.
They are already on the payroll. Use a common sense approach.
If site visits are a must,and I think they should be, then get it done quick,and approved or rejected,36 hours max.
thanks
dick zzzz
IPAMS is entitled to their opinion, and that view prevailed under Secretary Norton -- who made a mockery of federalism, NEPA, "cooperative collaboration," and Congress' multiple-use, sustained yield mandate from the Federal Land Policy Management Act. She repeatedly broke the law and ignored science.
Secretary Salazar made clear he's breaking with the past. He'll involve all stakeholders -- including industry, local government, hunters and anglers, local citizens, landowners, and conservationists. Inside the government, the gold rush mentality of "anywhere, anyhow" is going to give way to a modicum of rational planning of how to develop mineral basins without trashing the land and other renewable resources in the long term. Along with public involvement, good science means listening to wildlife biologists, range ecologists, hydrologists, air experts, and archaeologists.
Salazar's approach is a good government package of balanced, common-sense reforms. Industry is sitting on 30 million acres of leases that it hasn't touched. Only 28% of federal onshore leases are actually producing. Penry's absurd hyperbole aside, that's enough land -- most of it in known mineral basins -- to keep drill rigs busy around-the-clock for a couple of decades. See today's Denver Post on the resurgence of drilling activity and renewed optimism within the industry: http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_14137063#ixzz0bwslQfHn
Truth is, new pipeline capacity out of the Rockies is already making Rockies gas far more competitive in 2010 than it was just a year ago. The economic recovery and fuel prices are also major movers. The gas industry will do just fine under Salazar's new approach, but it won't be at the expense of destroying the magnificent public lands and quality of life across New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and Montana.
Most important, Salazar is working with the President on broader energy policies emphasizing conservation, efficiency and renewables. Drilling the heck out of the Rockies and trashing the public domain won't solve anything. Real leadership recognizes the need to move away from from fossil fuels and build a globally competitive 21st century clean energy economy.
We currently spend $64 billion annually on drugs supporting the Mexican drug cartel, we have the highest per capita prison population in the world, our murder rates are 2nd to none and we consume more resources than any other country in the world and demand more.
The American land mass is unique in terms of rich top soils, productive forests, forgiving latitudes, once rich fisheries off 3 shores, once abundent fresh water supplies, abundant minerals and a highly diverse landscape. And yet we can't live under our own "tent" as we must go the the "ends of the earth" to mine more in order to support our unsustainable existance.
A long winded answer to Salazar's restriction on mineral exploration, it's about time! The tiger can't be appeased by feeding it more meat in hopes that it will turn into a vegatarian!