Guest Column
Sarah Palin’s Advice to Gun Down Bears Is Both Reckless and Wrong
The audience for The Learning Channel's show potentially reaches thousands of families planning a trip to Yellowstone, where carrying guns is now legal. Unfortunately, the show fails to mention bear spray and the fact it's not legal to kill grizzlies in the lower 48.By Erin Edge, Guest Writer, 12-28-10
![]() |
|
| Sarah Palin promotes wildlife on her show about Alaska, except when instructing Kate Gosselin on the art of camping in bear country. Her advice? Bring yer gun. Image courtesy of The Learning Channel. | |
Since Sarah Palin’s Alaska first aired this fall on The Learning Channel (TLC), I’ve been watching the show with a kind of morbid curiosity. I expected the worst, given the former governor’s extreme anti-wildlife stances such as gunning down wolves and bears from planes to boost game herds. So I was pleasantly surprised to find Palin promoting wildlife for the most part. That was, until Kate came along.
On a recent episode, Palin and special guest Kate Gosselin (of ”Kate Plus Eight” fame) decide to take their families camping. In preparing for the camping trip, Palin takes Gosselin to a training course to learn how to deal with bears in the wild.
Palin’s advice? Grab yer gun!
“If you are unarmed and you’re out in the wilderness, and perhaps you’re with children camping, well you’re putting yourself and your family in danger if you are not armed, if you are not prepared for a predator,” says Palin, before heading off to the shooting range for target practice.
As a bear aware educator in Missoula, I spend a lot of time fighting against fears and misconceptions about bears. Bears are big creatures that can be scary, which is part of the reason grizzlies had been wiped out in the lower 48 by the beginning of the 20th century. So I could only watch in horror as Palin perpetuated one of the biggest whoppers of them all.
First, serious bear encounters are still extremely rare—even more so in Montana than in Alaska.
Second, when recreating in bear country, guns are not the only way that a person can protect herself or her family. In some cases, taking a shot at a bear has even been shown to do more harm than good.
Understanding how to recreate in bear country without attracting bears and being aware of bear behavior is the best way to avoid encounters with bears in the first place. However, in the chance encounter with a bear, bear spray provides an effective, nonlethal method of protection that can often increase chances of survival.
It’s unfortunate—and potentially tragic—that the show made no mention of bear spray, especially considering TLC’s ability to reach a wide audience that may be learning about encounters with wild animals for the first time. Instead, Palin seemed intent on instilling fear in any mother with children who’s planning a trip into bear country. I imagined thousands of families planning a summer vacation to Yellowstone, where guns are now allowed, believing that the only option to protect their family while hiking or camping is to carry a gun at all times.
The truth is, when used correctly, bear spray is a highly effective way to deter a bear, and in some cases much safer for both the bear and the person being attacked than shooting a gun. As stated in the USFWS’s fact sheet on bear spray:
Law enforcement agents for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service have experience that supports this reality—based on their investigations of human-bear encounters since 1992, persons encountering grizzlies and defending themselves with firearms suffer injury about 50 percent of the time. During the same period, persons defending themselves with pepper spray escaped injury most of the time, and those that were injured experienced shorter duration attacks and less severe injuries. Canadian bear biologist Dr. Stephen Herrero reached similar conclusions based on his own research – a person’s chance of incurring serious injury from a charging grizzly doubles when bullets are fired versus when bear spray is used.
Though it’s probably best to take everything Palin says with a grain of salt, her encouragement for gunning down bears is both reckless and wrong. And in the lower 48, where bears are still protected under the Endangered Species Act, it’s also illegal to kill a bear unless your life is in immediate danger. More often than not, taking a shot at a bear will only provoke it. Correctly using bear spray, on the other hand, has the best chance of preserving life on both ends of the nozzle.
Erin Edge is a bear conservation expert in Missoula, Mont., for Defenders of Wildlife and former director of education for Brown Bear Resources. Visit the site for the Center for Wildlife Information for more on using bear spray.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
"First, serious bear encounters are still extremely rare . . ."
One dead this year, several attacks on hunters each fall. Define, "serious." Dead?
Canadian bear expert Stephen Herrero has never published any research showing that "a person's chance of incurring serious injury from a charging grizzly doubles when bullets are fired versus when bear spray is used."
Neither Herrero, nor BYU professor Tom Smith, have published any data on firearms vs. bears in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
There's no data on firearms in Herrero's 1999 paper on bear spray, or Smith and Herrero's more recent paper on bear spray use in Alaska by hikers, researchers, and other non-hunters.
Having said that, Kate Gosselin and Sarah Palin are both perfect examples of people who should use bear spray, not a firearm. It was obvious Kate Gosselin didn't want to touch a gun. Palin was willing, but incompetent. Both would have been better off with bear spray.
In particular, bear spray was a much safer option than a firearm in a camp filled with kids.
You people can't be serious.
I can tell you that it is not easy to get a bear to charge you, contact with you and hurt you. Bears of all kinds do not read the scary books about themselves and most of the time they would much prefer NOT to have an encounter with a human that turns stressful. That said, bears do have tantrums and humans can cause them by being unobservant, moving too fast, and not understanding bear body language, or not even looking for it in the first place. Education about bears is really lacking because a lot of what is out there is simply not true. Pepper spray may not be perfect but it is the best thing for people who are experienced because neither the bear or human gets killed using it. Pepper spray has worked for me in the very few times I have needed it in hundreds of encounters with both brown and black bears. And, I only needed it before I learned much about bears.
I'm sorry, but I've hunted in Griz country & my 270 is all I'm packing!
Bear Spray may be relatively new to Alaskans, and I am sure they will use it when we have a few more proven cases that it will stop a charging grizzley at 10 yards. I wanna talk or hear from someone who has had this experiece. Personally, after watching a few y-tube videos of dumb people spraying each other, I think that if a bear got a face full of pepper spray, the bear would forget whatever he was doing and high tail it out. You cannot breath, eyes water terribly, and the pain is intense.
I do agree that bear spray will probably be better than a gun on a bear. That does not mean that carrying a gun is a bad idea in some instances.
Just more antiSara crap. The one politician who states we can have jobs and wilderness and does not beat around the bush about it.
Are you, ERIN, any chance from Missoula?
Lets just see, Mikey if you have the cojones to stand your ground and operate your bear spray canaster while that griz is bearing down on you.....
Big Sky,
Sara Palin is a first class idiot...nobody needs to put words in her mouth, the ones that come out make it obvious...there are many other competent conservatives on the political scene.
Sara stands for reality, the rest are just trying to straddle the fence never getting anything done
When you start calling people idiots bull, maybe look in the mirror first......
..and, yes, I also know how to carry/use a gun, but carry/use spray instead because it's the honorable thing to do.
Like minds, and all that .
I'm still trying to figure out what ' disnify' means in this context ? Is that like " reFudiate" , or something ?
Have we misunderestimated her as being the nukular option ?
If (Un)Reality is somehow trying to allude that the American public is " DisnEyfied " these days, I can think of no public figure who more resembles a cartoon caricature than Sarah Louise Palin.
I was told by Park Rangers that to make plenty of noise when you walk ie have small bells attached to your jacket and ten to one they will keep out of your way.
I do believe that the Park Rangers have more experience in these matters than Sarah Palin.
My personal belief is if someone is inexperienced in these matters and is carrying a gun (or guns) this will lead to a false sense of security which may embolden the wearer to be less respectful of wild creatures.
I believe guns have their uses such as holding up the local liquor store, but that is about it.
By the way, you must still working on the cost question posed to you on multiple blogs. “As a percentage of the confirmed depredation costs what are the non-confirmed depredation costs and depredation management costs of wolves?”
Dewey, You’re going to help me make "disnified" a common part of the English language if you keep trying to correct it! Thanks once more!
Dave Butcher, I don't think there are two may people that think a gun is better than pepper spray in the Grizzly / human confrontation. I carried it (pepper spray) on my Montana Bow hunts this year. But, would it not have been better if someone in camp pulled out a 45 and took care of business when mama grizzly was raising hell & had Deb Freele’s arm in his mouth near Yellowstone last July. Pepper spray also works on Canis lupus familiaris, my wife and I found that out on a rural bike ride a few years ago!
Your 'depredation cost" question is both baited and pointless . I can't take you down any more notches 'cuz yer already below ground level. You dragged us down to your level, then kept digging like a badger. I won't go there. When yer down in a hole like that , the best advice is ' quit shovelling'. I prefer the long view from above ground, thank you very much.
Sorry . I won't oblige ---not because I can't , but because it would not serve any useful purpose and certainly won't enlighten you or change your ossified mind. I could never give you any answer that would satisfy you , so if you don;t mind, I won't take your silly disnifying bait.
Maybe bring Dan Quayle back for a second try at VP as he never said it better,
"People that are really very weird can get into sensitive positions and have a tremendous impact on history."
Don't mind being called a Badger, being that I'm from Wisconsin & hoping UW beats Texas Christian on Saturday in the Rose bowl!
You’re just full of good stuff today! I would not have expected anything else from you but bowing out of the "Cost" of wolves topic. I'm reminded of your (more elk for you and more elk for my wolves) comment from past blogs! You don't want to get into the cost of wolves because you’re selfish and don't want to bring to light that for every Confirmed Depredation dollar there always are corresponding non-confirmed depredation and depredation management costs that the rancher and taxpayer will swallow! You and the Center for biodiversity selfishly care less about what those numbers will be when we add another 10,000 wolves around the country!
give it a rest
Gee, if you indeed have sprayed griz twice I guess I have to give you more credit for getting out and about....tip my hat to you....
I cannot agree more that bear spray is probably better than a gun. Few could aim a kill shot anyway, and I do know of one hiker in yellowstone that sprayed a bear chewing on his leg....the bear left.
Reality, we are sending snow your way (if it gets that far) and a bit of cold....its -3 here today.
Have a happy new year everyone! Go UW Badgers!
I don't think palin would evern be elected in wasilla again
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.../sarah-palin-popularity-poll_n_801907.html
Yes it appears Alaskans are quite icy on palin, and are quite upset at the way she misrepresents Alaska and Alaskans.
Alakans laugh at clowns in the lower 48 like reality22 who worship palin.
Tina Fey needs job security, however, so we need to keep Sarah " Snooki " Palin in the Fox News circus tent. But she really needs to keep doing her "Sarah Palin's Sarcaska" reality show. Especially when she can haul in the hot top Hollywood celebs like Kate Gosselin . Maybe that Octomom lady can be guest slotted into Wasilla for some heavy duty protein smashing from Grandma Grizzly to help feed her 14 kids...
America needs Sarah Palin , like we needed Ralph Kramden , and Lucy with her own First Dude, Desi Arnez.
Comic relief can never be overvalued. ( I have a feeling we'll be needing plenty in the coming New Year. Have a happy one ! )
SARA FOR PRESIDENT! (thumb nose at Jr and Dewey....) Ha Ha
http://www.examiner.com/bear-spray-in-national/hunters-should-take-lessons-from-bear-researchers
If bear spray truly provides better protection than a firearm, wouldn't biologists who work every day in grizzly country use bear spray?
If an Outsider like Ms. Edge wants to convince Sarah Palin and other Alaskans to use bear spray, perhaps the place to begin is by getting Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team biologists to use bear spray instead of firearms.
Sarah is incompetent with a gun? She got off two shots with a pump action shotgun in less than three seconds and managed to hit the kill zone. That's called being effective. By the way, the instructor did talk about other non lethal options. The lethal option only came in play when you have a bear running at you.
And bear spray? I looked up basic stats of brown and grizzly bears. So you're telling me that bear spray is an effective option against a 1,0000 lb animal that can reach a top speed of 35mph when it's charging at you? Man, common sense really is in short supply. Palin's right, if you go camping in bear country- grab yer gun.
So I'm guessing you're willing to head up to Alaskan bear country (Not Montana) for a week armed only with bear spray, right?
Sarah does have some redeeming qualities. She's been a boon to the fashion eyeware industry , for instance. You can't refudiate that.
Nobody is a buffoon 100 percent of the time. Hitler was a decent artist in his youth , and they tell me Stalin was in the seminary as a child. It's just that I am having a devil of a time trying to think of an instance or pattern of actions that shows Sarah Louise has any political competence to put on her resumé , let alone a proven track record.
The mammoth state of Alaska has fewer people than Dennis Kucinich's congressional district in Ohio , and Sarah ABORTED her governorship in the second trimester because she couldn't handle the load.
Sarah is bad news for America , and even worse news for the Republican Party, and they are finally starting to say that openly among themselves. She's unelectable, period.
Which is precisely why we need her to stick around ! We need Snooki to continue to hog the cameras, spew her Wasilla hillbilly wisdom on Faux Noise, and keep making ridiculous speeches on the mashed potato circuit to replenish the groaner sound bite pool. Sarah is a godsend to the Democratic Party.
Of course she's good with a gun ...she keeps hitting her own feet with shot after shot after shot. Now THAT's gun control ...
what a dullard post.
I wll gladly go to AK bear country with only bear spray, wanna buy my ticket!
Sara is not proficient with a gun that has been proven.
She wants the world to think she's an outdoorsy person, but she's not.
She tries to put forth the sterotype that only right wingers camp/hunt/fish/explore the outdoors.
Her show is bigoted "reality" TV and you lap it up like the sheep you are.
FYI Alaskans see $ara for the joke/fraud she is, and they laugh at clowns like you in the lower 48 who worship he HA!
xax
u think a gun is gonna be effective against a 1,000 lb animals runing at 35 mph.
Your right common sense is in short supply here.
So how about that AK ticket xax?
The bear expert said the first shot should be just a noise maker. The second a bean bag. This expert said that such non lethal measures were highly effective. Now, if this is how the women were trained, how is this not good advice to share with an audience in protecting themselves and the bears?
Wisconsin sent Congressman Steve Kagen packing last election because he liked to spend above his means. I did not vote for Kagen even though he was co-sponsoring the HR6028 wolf bill. It looks like his replacement Reid Ribble may be just as good in regards to the wolf anecdote.
obama sucks but palin BHahahahahhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I've never once had to shoot at a bear,I have fired warning shots-over the heads of the bears,or into the ground in front of them.
I'll take a 30-06,.308,300 Win. mag,or a .338,even a 12 gauge with rifled slugs with me every time in "bear country". I do carry bear spray,and would rather use it than shoot a bear who is just being a bear,but to only have bear spray is just not all that safe in my opinion,and 40 plus years of hunting/backcountry experience.
Untrained and/or unskilled idiots running around with pump shotguns isn't all that great of an idea either,like the guy said on Sarah Palin's show-use the non-lethal methods first,if they don't work,shoot the bear-repeatedly.
No, taking a shot at a bear will usually end up with a dead bear,unless the person doing the shooting misses,which is why you carry a bolt-action rifle,or a pump shotgun with you when you're going to be around bears,that's just common sense.
That 8-10 second can of bear spray is not going to do sh*t if the wind is blowing,and blowing the wrong way.
Besides, reality TV shows ...aren't.
Personally , I preferred a .41 mag long barrel ... Ruger Blackhawk if you force me to espouse a brand and model, but I quit carrying both gun and bear spray years ago. All my encounters with griz in northwest Wyoming have been positive. I shoot with a Nikon . Always have. Nobody dies.
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/03/26/bearspray.html#ixzz1A5RlF3Vr
FREDTERP
"Despite persistent doubts among hikers and campers venturing into bear country, you're better off with an eight-ounce can of bear spray than a gun, according to an analysis of 20 years of data.
Canadian and U.S. researchers announced Wednesday that they found the spray stopped aggressive bear behaviour in 92 per cent of the cases, whether that behaviour was an attack or merely rummaging for food. Guns were effective about 67 per cent of the time. "
Maybe we can get Sarah to plug pepper spray on her next show , when she has that great conservative outdsoors woman Rachel Ray as a guest and works in a little cooking segment.. Salmon Caliente perhaps, a nice King salmon filet broiled with red pepper honey glaze with lime and garlic, or maybe some Alaskan ceviche.
I'm still working on the concept of a paintball gun that fires little globules of exploding Tabasco sauce. A hybrid bear defense tool keeps the gun nuts happy and secures their fragile egos by letting them pack " heat" .
*
..still trying to decode (Un)Reality's last comment here, but since I promised not to feed the trolls this year forward, I won't comment on the inanity of it or write anything that encourages him to troll a little more...
Near incapacitation two out of 71 times is still a high enough percentage of failure to stop the bear that I'm still taking a firearm with me.
This entire article,and quite a few of the comments are not based in truth at all-the guy instructing caribou Barbie and Kate said use non-lethal methods first,no one is calling for random shooting of bears.
As I said in a prior post,as a lifelong hunter,I've never shot a bear-(other than a black bear when I was young,and I didn't like the meat,so I never hunted bear again)-just the noise usually scares the bear away,and I'm not rich,so I'll spend a buck fifty on a rifle round before I use the $35.00-$40.00 can of spray.
The other problem is why the fixation on Sarah Palin?
She shot about six times at the little caribou she got,and watching the show out of boredom,I'm not even sure she shot it,it didn't show the last shot all that clearly, I think her father,or the other guy shot it.
Fredterp, Interesting article ... this was one of the comments for that article "This is the CBC and Dewey being controversial to generate interest in the story. The actual article /study does not state anything about the effectiveness of guns. It's all about the effectiveness of bear spray. Read for yourself: http://www.wildlifejournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&doi=10.2193/2006-452&ct=1" (per comment)
Mountain hunter, your correct about the fixation on Palin.... more so, by the ones that would not vote for her then the ones that would!
I've found a great deterrent to frequentative bears is simply to strategically piss along the perimeter of camp. The next morning the trees will be scratched but they won't cross the "line". Of course when the griz comes into camp on ballerina slippers, walks between the tent you and your wrangler are sleeping in and the dining tent, and lets a 25 pound roped ham down from the tree branch , and the two dogs don't even wake up or bark and the horses don't whinny , what can you do ? ( Dike Creek off Howell Fork of Mountain Creek , Sept 75).
Grizzlies are smart. I respect them for that . They generally do not want trouble. Guns make trouble.
Michio Hoshino was killed in Kamchatka. Not my problem . Different bears, long used to doing mortal combat with stupid Russians. Bred to fight like dogs you might say. Gibbs had a loaded .45 with him at the time he was killed. He didn't use it. Hard to make any kind of case from that . Hard to say what happened with Tesinsky, but that bear was exterminated with prejudice. A Montana FWP ranger had a mix-up with a Grizz near Hungry Horse in 2001 when he was trying to release it from a culvert trap .It took all 6 shots from his service .357 to drop the bear. What if it had needed 7 instead ? The guy was ready for bear, trained, and quick on the draw, and his point blank gun almost was not enough . Conclusions ?
By the way , you left out the best "Bear Eats Photographer" story of all... Timothy Treadwell. Who probably deserved it for his many stupidities, but his hot girlfriend Aimee did not, unfortunately . There is no cure for Stupid.
All of my encounters with bears across 38 years have ranged from mildly annoying to positive to fabulous. No guns or spray were used , or needed.
Thanks for your input, but I will stay with my own wide long personal experience here. I'm genuinely sorry that you and so many others feel less insecure of a man if you don't have a gun strapped on , and feel it's absolutely necessary to pack heat in bear country. Lots of things can hurt or kill you , but there's something about Mountain Machismo that says " Man must shoot Bears"
There's no cure for Stupid. But respect and savvy go a long ways.
I'm also the only guy you've ever corresponded with who's been up close and personal with Komodo Dragons in the wild in Indonesia, even to the point of hand feeding the one that lived by the Sea Gypsy boat landing. As much as I love my many Wyoming grizzly bear photos , I am totally proud of my Komodo dragon portraits...jet black eyes, red mouth , rows of teeth , a 2-foot yellow tongue, and claws that make a grizzly's look like a salon manicure job.
But those are for some other blogsite's worthless discussion.
G-day.
I’ve only had two encounters with bears both up in Slough Creek north of Yellowstone. One was a bear we chased off a gut pile when we came back for my quartered elk. We thought it was a brown phase black bear from what we saw of it heading down through the timber, but the tracks we saw by the gut pile after we had the quarters loaded said different. The other, was more of a close encounter for my brother and cousin…. (My other brother and I were less than a hundred yards away). .. They had the sow & cubs surprise them as they were making a climb on the south side of the ridge. Cubs off to the right and mom came over the ridge from the left. No shots were fired but both were shaken and had to put on new underwear on back at camp. They said the sow had come from our direction & left in our direction, but we did not see it.
I do judge the person carrying it on an individual basis.
*
Don't get me going on Sarah " Snooki " Palin , though... back when Wyoming became the Equality State and actually meant it, my grandmother was one of the first woman judges anywhere , was active in politics and civic affairs, started the local American Legion Ladies Auxilliary , went from dirt poor Depression era widow farming out the 6 kids to ranch families to being a respected businesswoman who owned a lot of properties and built a lot of houses. She was a very conservative woman who was an excellent example to all, Sarah P wouldn't be a pimple on her derriere. I know what strong capable conservative women are suposed to be emulate. I see none of it in Sarah Louise "Bimbo" Palin whatsoever. You'all are being utterly fooled.
- by way of reminder , the premise of this article that Palin's televised on the record advice about guns and bears being 'reckless' , is quite defensible. QED.
I found this article and it's title to be highly unfair and slanted to ignore the firearm and bear training that the women attended. Is being educated, trained, and prepared to protect one's family sleeping in their tents objectionable?
I have watched the episode a couple of times. Nowhere is there a suggestion to "gun down a bear" indicated. Nowhere will you see a firearm close at hand when they are in camp. It's a bit underhanded for the article author and others to step over the facts to put forth this personal attack for political reasons. Hate Palin all you want, but be honest about the facts which include using a blank round, first, followed by a beanbag round before lethal rounds from the shotgun. The bear expert in the segment clearly indicated that the nonlethal measures were highly effective. What part of that do you object to?
BTW, the quoted "fact sheet" in this article is NOT the effort of a study. Dig a little and you will find much ad hoc opinion based on comparing apples and oranges. Pepper spraying bears away from garbage cans is not even close to dealing with an aggressive bear who means business. This is much misinformation and conjecture here that will put people in peril. I hope the author accepts the responsibility for such nonsense.
Google for " Palinisms" and read till it becomes un-BEAR-able.
I do know Marc Bruscino here in Cody , the Wyoming Game and Fish bear wrangler who trapped and/or reloacted 75 grizzlies this year. He advises to carry both gun and spray , and be well rehearsed in using both , and be bear aware. Can anyone give betetr advice than that ?
I checked out of this thread. It's going nowhere, reached its shelf life. Time to gather up the spent brass and reload for the next target of opportunity. Pass the Tabasco....
;)
That would be Forum Comment Trolls....
"Some salient statistics showing that bear deterrent is better than a firearm: Those who defend themselves with firearms suffered serious injury in about 50 percent of encounters. Those who used bear deterrent suffered far fewer and less serious injuries and were subjected to shorter durations of attack than those who defended with firearms alone"
http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/05/us-geological-survey-releases-bear-safety-fact-sheet/
Journal article
http://www.jstor.org/pss/3873165
How many of those injured when using firearms were not skilled marksmen or hunters? Doesn't give that information.
IF a bear is charging,pepper spray is not likely to do much until the bear is way too close-if a bear is charging me,I'm not waiting until it's 15 yards from me-I'm using a centerfire rifle that's .308 or larger caliber,and starting to shoot at about 35-40 yards. My .300 Wim mag gives me 5 rounds-4 in the magazine-one in the chamber-same with most rifles-one well placed shot is going to stop the bear,maybe two if it's really mad.
As long as you don't surprise a bear,you aren't likely to have to use spray,or a firearm,so don't surprise a bear, and you won't have a problem,in most cases.
Complemented by my new aerosol Pepper Sauce hand grenades. The fun only increases.
Finally a real hand grenade. Not for the bear charging, but to use on yourself. Fall all over it.
THAT is how ludicrous this Guns vs. Spray debate appears to me. The choice of caliber and handgun model does not matter one whit. It's not about the hardware, it's all about the software...your brain , reflexes, and especially attitude.
I fear gun nuts far more than I fear bears. YMMV
*
Dang. I haven't even picked up my spent brass to reload from the verbal shoot out at this NewWest forum , and there's already a riot and fusillades over at the Norm Bishop piece " What are wolves worth ? ".
If you actually read my posts,I said I have never,in over 40 years of hunting in "bear country" had to shoot a bear-I do carry bear spray,but like I said,I am not rich, so I'll shoot a few rounds at about $1.50 each before I use the $35.00-40.00 can of pepper spray. Just the noise usually scares a bear away.
IF you did have to shoot a bear-caliber DOES matter.
So because someone is a hunter,that makes tham a gun nut?
Not everyone is as anti-gun,anti-hunting as you are.
The wolf stories have all been argued in the past on this site.
There's nothing new to add,other than the extreme enviros shot themselves in the foot this time,and will end up causing major changes to the ESA.
Fear of gun nuts? Nothing to fear from responsible gun owners. By the way, there is this: http://www.examiner.com/bear-spray-in-national/bear-spray-or-bullets-sarah-palin-s-choice-irks-environmentalists Rather interesting that the biologists are packing heat.
Mountain hunter is right, just don't surprise a bear. Now apply that advice to gun owners.
Just because you swaddle your child in newspaper doesn't make the kid a journalist....
----
By the way , I wish you and Mountain Hunter and everybody else here would read what I write, instead of firing your idiomatic blunderbusses straight back at what you hear in your head when you stare at my words and see my name attached to it.
I 'm not an anti-hunter nor do I generally think gun owners are sociopaths or psychopaths. I judge hunters and outfitters and gun owners on an individual basis. Remember, I live in and grew up in Cody ... a gun mecca and hunting/outfitting bazaar. I have a huge working database on gun owners and gun users and old west impersonators.
They all speak for themselves, and they reveal all. I carry MACE under the front seat of my Volvo.
I did read your posts
" I fear gun nuts more than I fear bears"
"Finally a real hand grenade. Not for the bear charging,but to use on yourself. Fall all over it"
From another post of yours "guns make trouble"
Your posts all seem anti-hunting,anti-gun.
No dignified response.
- and don't take it/make it personal , either.
Back in October of '09 here at NW there was another bear column: http://www.newwest.net/main/article/should_hunter_who_killed_grizzly_bear_be_prosecuted/
To quote from it: "When should you shoot? It’s a real dilemma. The grizzly Mr. Westmoreland shot might have whirled and fled, or it might have charged, which makes it far more difficult to hit and kill. Plus, the bear might stop 30 yards away, 15 yards away, 2 yards away, or anywhere in between. In Bear Attacks: Their Causes And Avoidance, biologist Stephen Herrero says to shoot at a charging grizzly at 100 to 50 feet or less. In the Bear Encounter Survival Guide, British Columbia hunting guide James Gary Shelton recommends shooting at 25 yards. In Backcountry Bear Basics, I recommend shooting when the charging bear is 5 to 7 yards away. Whether you shoot at 33 yards or 5 yards, you’re only gonna have time for one shot if you’re using a bolt-action rifle—hold off as long as you can, and then make your one shot count. You should decide at what distance you’ll shoot before you ever go afield. "
Notice the reference to Herrero about when to shoot.
I don't take the posts on this forum personal,or make them personal,with the exception of when "Hunters are cowards" made a series of "personal attacks" directed at me.
The best choice when around bears is to carry spray and a firearm.
As I said the best way to avoid problems is to not surprise a bear.
Maybe my perception of you is skewed due to the way a lot of your posts read,however, I see you did mention you are for managed wolf hunts,and you did say you are not anti-hunting,anti-gun. Notice I did say "seem to be" concerning your posts.
You said that you wished myself and others would read your posts-same here-too many people just answer without reading entire posts,I've done,and you've done it.
No matter,like I said-this entire discussion is based on inaccurate information by the author-when Sarah Palin went to the bear training guy he said first, try non-lethal methods-first round is for noise,second is a beanbag,third is live ammo.
I'm sure we will see a future article about the gold rush show-they actually shot a bear. (leagally)
"In 62% (31 of 50) brown bear incidents bears were either acting curious or searching for food or garbage before being sprayed. Of these bears, 13% (3 of 31) were acting aggressively with respect to obtaining food; 87% (27 of 31) were not acting aggressively."
In 68% (13 of 19) of black bear incidents, bear were either acting curious or were searching for food or garbage. Of these bears, none acted aggressively toward people while in pursuit of human foods."
"In both polar bear incidents, subadult bears approached humans in a pickup truck there to observe bears feeding on bowhead whale remains. In both instances (100%), bear spray stopped the bear's approach and turned the bear away."
No wonder bear spray has such a high success rate.
The guide had to bail her out after she missed 8 shots!
She's not a hunter, not an outdoorsperson, she's a CON.
She wants to portray this image that only the right wing gun nuts know the outdoors.
She is a prjdudice bigot who preachers her views in her "reality show"
She's taking you for a ride, Alaskans HATE sarah palin and how she tries to rep their state.
Notice how all the subsistence hunters in the bush communities voted for Murkowski not palin's joe miller.
$arah is a bigoted fool and the world laughs at her.
Even funnier is clowns in the lower 48 who thinks shes cool or a presidential candidate Bahahha!
Alaskans laugh at right wing nutters in the lower 48 who follow this fool $arah off the cliff!
"wait until palin is in the white house"
the definition of a delusional right wing nutter.
Sarah Palin is the reason John Mcain lost to Obama, this is an indesputable FACT!
palin is the absolute worst thing for the republican party and many republicans are finially relaizing this.
Only the truly nutty, bigoted right wing nutjobs think she will be president, is a hunter.outdoorsperson, is good for america etc.
palin is a reality tv star and you think she's fit to be presdient also, grow a brain right wing nutter bigots.
This discussion was about the total misrepresentation of the episode by the writer... not about presidential politics.
So far as the hunting episode, I take from your comment that you failed to watch it. She was using her father's rifle to make the shot. The scope was way off as was demonstrated by her father himself when he tried to shoot a paper plate. Palin made the kill shot with the family friend's rifle. There was no guide at their drop camp. Why was the rifle off? If you had watched you would have seen her father take a bad fall while carrying the rifle. They failed to check it afterward.
Don't let the facts get in the way of your rant.
Right wing nutter bigots? as opposed to left wing nutter bigots?
Apparently you are in the latter category.
You obviously did not watch the show,she did not miss 8 times,she missed 6 times,and this was after her father had fallen with the rifle she was using. Later in the show-the rifle could not hit a paper plate-the scope was knocked off it's zero by the fall.
You also missed the point of the discussion-the author misrepresented the facts,nowhere during the course of the show did anyone reccomend "that anyone "gun down bears".
Sarah Palin is not the reason Mcain lost,Obama got a lot of the young voters to vote for him with his hope & change bullshit.
Whether or not Sarah Palin runs for president,or stays out of the race,she sure as hell has the left all bent out of shape.
No one is blindly following Palin,like all Nobama's blind followers who voted him in,and now wish they hadn't.
Palin is a reality tv star,and Obama still never was anything other than a community organizer,and his lack of political knowledge/skills shows every time he's in another country,bowing to their leaders,and apologizing for this country.
PS Not sure if Harley is male or female....but she writes like a female.
Ol Kate reminds me of my wife, He He. Wifey watched it and suggested I see if Sarah has any single sisters....Ha Ha
The bear debate spews on and on....sprey, gun, who knows till you are in that situation.....
Apparently Alaskans use the gun method, if necessary. With the number of bears they have along the coast, I think people who get out up there pretty much know how to avoid bears. Mabye let the Alaskans take care of their own problems, something us right wingers apparently can't do in the west. We gotta have liberals tell us how we should live.....
Say what you will about Sarah. After all, she is a politician and they are fair game. She is use to it.
I like the fact that she is straight faced regardless. No riding the fence like Baucus, Obama, and now Tester (in Montana)
The liberals would hate it, but she would make a great president, or better than anyone else out there.
Sarah cost McCann the electrion? Naaaa, I voted for McCain because he had Sarah to carry the reins if he croaked....
Be funny to see ol harley (or whoever) get fired up if she runs....
Interesting news headline given comments by the palin haters here.
12-19 real mike:"I hope her advice [on guns for self-defense against bears] continues to widely publicized to the public will get ever more sick and tired of her and the Nazi GOP publicity machine that tried to foist this idiot on the national scene."
1-01 Dewey: "Hitler was a decent artist in his youth, Stalin was in the seminary as a child"
"her show is bigoted reality TV and you lap it up like the sheep you are."