guest commentary
Severely Burned Forests: One of Nature’s Best-Kept Secrets
By Richard L. Hutto, Guest Writer, 7-17-08
As summer wildfire season begins in earnest throughout much of the West, it’s important for the public and policymakers to recognize the important role that severely burned forests play in maintaining wildlife populations and healthy forests. Severely burned forests are neither “destroyed” nor “lifeless.”
From my perspective as an ecologist, I have become aware of one of nature’s best-kept secrets —there are some plant and animal species that one is hard-pressed to see anywhere outside a severely burned forest.
Consider the black-backed woodpecker. This bird species is relatively restricted in its distribution to burned-forest conditions Everything about it, including its jet-black coloration, undoubtedly reflects a long evolutionary history with burned forests. This (and many other) woodpecker species rely on the larvae of wood-boring beetles, some of which are so specialized that they have infrared sensors allowing them to detect and then colonize burning forests.
Many additional bird species, including the mountain bluebird, three-toed woodpecker, and olive-sided flycatcher, also reach their greatest abundance in severely burned forests. And then there’s the fire morel, which occurs only in severely burned forests. This has been a boom year for morel mushrooms at the local farmer’s market precisely because of last year’s severe forest fires in western Montana.
An appreciation of the biological uniqueness of severely burned forests is important because if we value and want to maintain the full variety of organisms with which we share this Earth, we must begin to recognize the healthy nature of severely burned forests. We must also begin to recognize that those are the very forests targeted for post-fire logging activity. Unfortunately, post-fire logging removes the very element—dense stands of dead trees—upon which many fire-dependent species depend for nest sites and food resources.
With respect to birds, the effects of post-fire salvage harvesting are uniformly negative. In fact, most timber-drilling and timber-gleaning bird species disappear altogether if a forest is salvage-logged. Therefore, such places are arguably the last places we should be going for our wood.
We need to change our thinking when it comes to logging after forest fires. There is potential economic value in the timber, yes, but there are numerous other values in a burned forest. And the prospect of losing those values must be weighed against the potential economic gain that may accompany postfire timber harvest. Burned areas are probably the most ecologically sensitive places from which we might extract trees.
I am not at all opposed to responsible timber harvesting; it’s simply that there are numerous green-tree forests, especially those near homes and communities, that can be harvested sustainably and without anywhere near the ecological threat one faces when harvesting in a severely burned forest.
Severely burned forests are one of nature’s best-kept secrets because the public really hasn’t caught on to these facts yet. And I haven’t even touched on some of the more fascinating stories about plants and animals that are restricted to burned-forest conditions. Being unaware of these stories, people naturally want to harvest trees they see as otherwise wasted resources.
But nature doesn’t waste anything. Burned forests, especially severely burned forests, are forests that have been “restored” in the eyes of numerous plant and animal species and in the eyes of an informed public. The burned trees are essential for maintaining an important part of the biological diversity we value today, and are the foundation for the forests of the future.
So, while it may seem counterintuitive, trying to make a quick buck off the burned forests today is more like borrowing from the forests of tomorrow. Our forests and the biological legacy we leave to future generations will be diminished if we fail to listen to the birds.
Richard L. Hutto is director of the Avian Science Center and professor of biology at the University of Montana. Learn more the University of Montana’s Avian Science Center at www.avianscience.dbs.umt.edu.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.



Comments
Your woodpeckers have plenty of habitat now, Dr. Hutto. Be nice to see some for the rest of biodiversity, including those nasty humans.
Thanks for writing this thought provoking guest commentary. Let's hope the main stream media will pick up on at least some of this important ecological information as the annual fire season approaches here in Montana.
Really you should wait a couple years to go and do your hiking. Hopefully a severe windstorm doesnt pop up out of nowhere and ruin your splendid experience by a tree falling on you.
I live in the mountains. 200 inches of snow in town fell from the sky. Bears hang out in clearcuts. Its wild but it aint wilderness.
Wilder than you think. Wildlife is doing better than ever. In places you wouldnt think of thinking to go to.
Stay in Bozeman and Missoula its safe there.
While I agree with your general premise that burned over forests are important biologically and provide unique habitat opportunities for many species, your preaching against salvage logging is way off the mark. On federal lands the salvage logging proposals that you see proposed tend to average about 10% or less of the area covered by the fires. To harvest 10% or less of these areas seems to be more than reasonable. That leaves ~90% of the effected area to meet biological needs. If anything salvage logging seems to be getting the poor part of the bargain. Remember, on most public lands we have to find a balance in managing for multiple uses.
Reading further into your article I really dislike to tone of your statement that burned forests are "restored forests in the eyes of an informed public." You seem to suggest that an informed public would come to the same conclusions and opinions that you have reached.
I would hazard to guess that a truly informed cross-section of the public would realize the unique biological opportunities that burned over forests provide, but also would recognize the opportunity to provide goods that we all consume daily and decent paying jobs in our communities.
I really don't enjoy a burnt forest for viewing pleasure or any outdoor activity. I've felled timber after a forest fire and personally didn't find anything wonderful about it.
The trees were all twisted and dried out. The lumber mill that took the burnt trees complained about the logs. The only good thing was that some of the trees were salvaged, I guess.
It's time we let American citizens manage our forest again.
Atleast when the slash burning was done after the logging, it's usually done in the spring and fall time and I haven't seen too many controlled burns that got away, except some of the Forest Service controlled burns.
This crazy notion that wildfires are the greatest tool for our forests ecology has got to stop!
Just found this site and thought it might be useful to chat to people who are trying to accomplish the same as me!
I spend too much of my life on the internet and look forward to chatting to you all and picking up and sharing ideas along the way!
Eva