Yellowstone Club Trial

The Case Against Edra Blixseth

Combined with recent court filings made by Edra Blixseth in her personal bankruptcy case, the evidence Monday painted a picture of a woman who, at a minimum, made some extraordinarily poor financial decisions.

By Jonathan Weber , 5-04-09

  Edra Blixseth outside the Missoula courthouse last week. Photo by Blaine Dunkley.
  Edra Blixseth outside the Missoula courthouse last week. Photo by Blaine Dunkley.

As Tim Blixseth fights fraud allegations in the Yellowstone Club bankruptcy case, his preferred defense is one that will likely be familiar to any veteran of a bitter and contested divorce: it’s all his ex-wife’s fault.

Judge Ralph B. Kirscher has for the most part excluded evidence relating to the couple’s 2008 divorce from the trial now taking place in bankruptcy court over a $375 million Credit Suisse loan to the club.

But with Edra Blixseth on the witness stand Monday, Tim Blixseth’s attorney, Michael Flynn, finally managed to make at least part of his case against Edra. Combined with recent court filings made by Edra Blixseth in her personal bankruptcy case, the evidence Monday painted a picture of a woman who, at a minimum, made some extraordinarily poor financial decisions. And there is an argument to be made that she, and not Tim, is the one now responsible for paying back almost $200 million to the club.

A personal financial statement prepared just after the divorce settlement, introduced into evidence on Monday, shows a frightening list of liabilities - and assets that are pegged at values that are very high even in a pre-meltdown scenario. The financial statement shows debts of nearly $100 million. Her bankruptcy filing, which came about six months later, shows debts of $100 million to secured creditors and another $57 million to unsecured creditors.

The creditors include myriad banks and finance companies (almost $20 million to American Bank, $13 million to Western Capital, $8 million to Wachovia, and $7 million to Stockman’s Bank, for starters) as well as individuals (including $500,000 to Hollywood heavyweight Bert Sugarman), and numerous tax authorities ($7 million to the IRS, $2.5 million to the state of California, $1.5 million to the state of Montana, and smaller amounts to local tax authorities in Montana, California and Washington). She owes some $26.5 million on a legal settlement relating to Blxware, a software company, at least $3.5 million on a litigation settlement in the LeMond case, and of course she owes CrossHarbor Capital $35 million, which it loaned to her in August of 2008 to enable her to complete the divorce settlement.

Her assets are not trivial (and many serve as collateral for the above loans), but then again the values assigned to them back in August are, to put it mildly, optimistic. The Porcupine Creek estate near Palm Springs estate is pegged at $207 million - far more than it would likely have commanded in a sale even then, and probably several times more than it could be sold for now. The Yellowstone Club itself is valued at $500 million - exactly $500 million more than it was worth just a few months later. The 160-acre “family compound” at the club is listed at $40 million. There’s a $19.5 million receivable from her son’s defunct Story Mill development project. And the Chateau de Farcheville outside Paris is said to be worth $64 million.

This last item is critical, because Edra was counting on the sale of Farcheville at that price to pay back all sorts of debts and keep the Yellowstone Club afloat. But the sale fell through in September, and it’s now likely that Farcheville will be sold for something closer to $20 million.

In court testimony Monday, Edra acknowledged that she had agreed to take on responsibility for almost $200 million that was transferred from the Yellowstone Club to BGI, the holding company she had co-owned with her ex-husband, which in turn owns the Yellowstone Club. The club and the committee representing unsecured creditors contend that the transfer was a “distribution” that rendered the club insolvent. But Tim Blixseth (and Credit Suisse) say it was a legitimate loan, and that repayment remains the responsibilty of BGI (now owned by Edra).

The rest of the day Monday was spent on more expert witness testimony about whether the club could support a $375 million loan. The financial projections that Credit Suisse relied on matched Edra Blixseth in their, um, radical optimism; sales were projected to skyrocket just after the closing of the loan, with even things like the far-from-finished Warren Miller Lodge condos being counted on for serious revenue sooner rather than later.

Yet much of the case comes back to the question of whether the payments to BGI were legitimate loans, or simply dividends dressed up as loans. If they were the former, the club was not insolvent, there likely was no fraudulent transfer or breach of fiduciary duty, and Edra Blixseth could still be on the hook (though that won’t do the club much good, since it was Tim, not Edra, that emerged from the divorce with plenty of money). If the two-page, unsecured promissory notes are judged not to have been real loans, though, then it all looks very different, and Edra Blixseth at least won’t have to add that item to her long list of debts.



Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.

NEW WEST FEATURES                                                                 More>>

Advertisement

Comments

By hello kitty, 5-04-09
By Blockhead, 5-04-09
By Friend of Big Sky, 5-04-09
By Adam, 5-05-09
By GDM, 5-05-09
By Blochead, 5-05-09
By Adam, 5-05-09
By Concerned Local, 5-05-09
By clem from boise, 5-05-09
By Nameless, 5-05-09
By loneranger, 5-05-09
By Observer, 5-05-09
By Yawn, 5-05-09
By GC, 5-05-09
By hello kitty, 5-05-09
By Incognito, 5-05-09
By Friend of Big Sky, 5-05-09
By blockhead, 5-05-09
By Blockhead, 5-05-09
By blockhead, 5-05-09
By Nancy, 5-06-09
By GDM, 5-06-09
By Adam, 5-06-09
By Friend of Big Sky, 5-06-09
By Elkaholic, 5-06-09
By eyewitness, 5-06-09
By Loneranger, 5-06-09
By Vendor, 5-06-09
By Loneranger, 5-06-09
By Tonto, 5-06-09
By blockhead, 5-06-09
By eyewitness, 5-06-09
By Loneranger, 5-06-09
By YC now MDR, 5-06-09
By GC, 5-06-09
By Blockhead, 5-06-09
By Yes we can't, 5-06-09
By Loneranger, 5-06-09
By Deep Throat, 5-06-09
By Concerned Local, 5-06-09
By Deep Throat, 5-06-09
By Concerned Local, 5-06-09
By blockhead, 5-07-09
By Dave D, 5-07-09
By impoverishedyokel, 5-07-09
By Incognito, 5-07-09
By loneranger, 5-07-09
By Concerned Local, 5-07-09
By GC, 5-07-09
By blockhead, 5-07-09
By mochsie, 5-07-09
By Friend of Big Sky, 5-07-09
By Peaches, 5-07-09
By Peaches, 5-07-09
By Deep Throat, 5-07-09
By Frank Rizzo, 5-07-09
By Incognito, 5-08-09
By Porkerscreek, 5-09-09

Comment policy:

NewWest.Net encourages robust and lively, but civil participation from our readers. By posting here, you agree to the NewWest.Net terms of service. You agree to keep your comments on topic, respectful and free of gratuitous profanity. Contributions that engage in personal attacks, racism, sexism, bigotry, hatred or are otherwise patently offensive will be subject to removal.

Other than using a filter that scans for comment spam, we do not moderate contributions before they are posted and we do not review every thread, so we ask that you help us in keeping the discussions civil and appropriate. Please email info@newwest.net to notify us of comments that may violate these guidelines. Thanks for your help and cooperation. Click here for some tips on how to best interact on NewWest.Net.

Your Comment

Name

Email

Remember my name and email address.

Notify me of follow-up comments.

 

Marketplace