The Potential of Bitterroot Resort
By Tom Maclay, Unfiltered 2-27-06
The extraordinary potential of Bitterroot Resort begins with the vibrant recreational character of Missoula, Missoula and Ravalli Counties, and Montana.
We love to recreate here. We love to ski and snowboard here. In fact, we are nearly three times as likely to identify ourselves as avid skiers than the rest of the country. We have the 5th highest concentration of snow skiers and boarders in the U.S.
We love to hike, fish, ride, and hang out in the outdoors. There is no question that we have the support here for a world-class, sustainable, four-season destination resort. Seventy-seven percent of chamber members polled support the concept of a destination ski resort as envisioned by Bitterroot Resort. In 1988, more than 60 percent of Missoulians voted to support a destination resort on Lolo Peak.
The land proposed for Bitterroot Resort has been designed as a potential ski resort site for more than three decades. We are only seeking to preserve the option of such development in the future. It’s only prudent planning – underscored by research that shows that Western Montana is under-served today given consumer demand for winter recreation. Research also shows that by 2015, skier demand for a fully developed Bitterroot Resort will be nearly 40 percent higher than demand was during the last winter season.
Downhill skiing already accounts for 15 percent of the recreation on the Lolo and Bitterroot National Forests – a big recreational benefit being provided under highly controlled conditions on small parcels of public land.
With our proposal, a century-old Montana family is committed to crafting a destination for recreation, to provide the private land on which the health of the modern day resort economy depends.
We invite a community partnership. We want your thinking about the look and feel and adventures of this new community.
Bitterroot Resort is in close proximity to a growing population center in Missoula, to a four-lane highway, and to a commercial airport.
The resort would provide skiers and boarders an elevation and northern exposure for quality snow retention, water rights sufficient for excellent snowmaking, vast intermediate terrain that skiers and snowboarders prefer, and magnificent scenery.
Bitterroot will also be a catalyst for economic growth, by creating good paying jobs, encouraging year-round tourism, increasing the dollars flowing into our communities, and attracting clean desirable businesses to Western Montana. We are eager to work with Montana businesses to help them grow. That’s a big part of the promise of Bitterroot Resort.
It is important to remember that the planning process currently underway does not present a mandate for action; it only establishes land-use priorities. Bitterroot Resort itself will be considered in a comprehensive process prescribed by the National Environmental Policy Act only after the management plans have been completed.
We are refining a proposal that would employ less than 4/10ths of one percent of the public land on the Bitterroot and Lolo National Forests to create a diverse year-round recreational experience that would meet growing demand for public land recreation and help provide the economically sustainable use of National Forest Lands.
All of us support the goals, and certainly the aesthetics of the research zone on Carlton Ridge. In fact, Bitterroot’s recommended designation does not modify the Carlton Ridge Research Management Area. Moreover, Bitterroot Resort’s recommendation is consistent with the expressed understanding of the Forest Service at the formation of the research area that science and skiing are compatible uses.
Allocations that allow for the future ski destination can actually serve to introduce more people to the beauty of the Selway Bitterroot backcountry. That’s because young and old Nordic skiers, Alpine skiers and boarders, mountain bikers, hikers and even persons in wheelchairs could be carried to ski lifts to relatively high elevations and over 150 miles of backcountry views and adventures located South and West of Lolo Peak.
As new plans are developed for these forests, allocating a small amount of public land to potential skiing gives the Forest Service flexibility to enable Montanans and future visitors to the Bitterroot Valley each access to skiing and other organized recreation from four-lane U.S. 93 – to a site the Forest Service has recognized for decades as an ideal winter recreation opportunity.
I support additional wilderness which is Southwest of Lolo Peak about 7000 acres. A public resort is our preferred alternative for this area North of Carlton Ridge and Lolo Peak.
I see the resort as a component of this great community – perhaps similar to the University or the arts community. I have been told that at a point there were more Maclay graduates of the U of M than any other family. The U of M has greatly enriched our family’s life and history. I believe this recreational resort can enrich the community’s life and history by creating an opportunity for families to grow and stay in the Missoula and Bitterroot Valleys.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.




Comments
In terms of your "respect" for the Carlton Ridge research area it doesn't add up, after you have cut roads and re-opened previously decommissioned roads for your use. Heck you even had a Bombardier parked in the vicinity.
You can call it a destination resort all you want, but everyone knows the reality of the situation. It is a real estate venture that will turn into a future land grab for the haves, who will in turn increase the property tax for have nots. I have worked in the resort business and it amazes me that you try to convince people that this development will bring jobs to the area. Minimum wage jobs with no benefits are not going to supply local residents with the income they truly need.
Instead of worrying about developing the public lands that we as taxpayers pay for, why don't you worry about the impending litigation in front of you due to your dishonest and greedy tactics.
To wrap things up, your statistics are laughable and they mean nothing without some sort of reference. 80% approval in 1988? Then why doesn't the majority of the community agree with the development now with this so-called increased demand for recreation opportunities.
If you want to talk about recreation, why don't you talk to the many hunters, snowshoers, and backcountry skiers and snowboarders that use this area for FREE! Why would they want to pay to use their public land AND have the game leave the area that they either hunt or observe. It doesn't add up.
Maclay's desire to use 12,000 acres of OUR public land for his private purposes is like the elk in the living room. It's OUR Lolo Peak; it's in our living room, right out our front window. Its natural wildness must be preserved.
Is there no end to thinking that the highest use of any portion of the earth is to build on it? I would expect someone touting his generations-old Montana family background to have more respect for this earth, and for that specific piece of it. Old Dave Maclay must be turning over in his grave.
The only ski resort which uses more public land acreage is Vail Resort in Colorado at 12,226 acres. It's one of the reasons you find elk on the highway. Big Mountain, by comparison, uses 2,650 public land acres.
Let's be honest - regardless of what else this may be it's a huge proposal. After the illegal logging and road building that occurred last spring, I'm not at all convinced it is the right choice to turn over some of the public's most beloved lands to Tom Maclay.
Words are cheap, and the "Bitterroot Resort" public relations machine uses them liberally. However, perhaps Mr. Maclay should instead focus on the lawsuit brought against him by the Forest Service, as should the rest of us. That alone speaks volumes about his "stewardship" for our country's wild public lands.
There are loads of reasons to be against this resort development, but opponents are making a HUGE strategic error in basing their opposition on attacks on Mr. Maclay. He will, and should be, afforded a hearing on the merits of his plan and in no way will the oppositions feelings about Mr. Maclay be entertained as relevant.
Do your research, line up your facts, narrow your arguments and craft a consistent message. Attacking Mr. Maclay will backfire in the long run and in the short run just serves to make you look petty.
But I'd like to see him write more details on the impacts to our prized natural resources from the proposed golf course, homes, and major infrastructure planned for the Resort.
Also, as the entire Bitterroot watershed is currently over-appropriated for water rights, I'm not sure that the best use of our precious and scarce water resources is to take water from chronically dewatered streams like Lolo Creek to "make snow."
The biggest argument that I have seen for the resort is if it doesn’t happen, there is always the chance that a 5,000 home subdivision could go in with no sewer system. In my view, this would have a potentially devastating consequence on the land and the watershed….much more so than a resort would
Something is going to happen to Mr. Maclay’s property…the growth of the whole valley is inevitable. My opinion, voice and vote is still open to both sides of the argument, but listening to the ramblings of some of the resort opponents keeps pushing me to Mr. Maclay’s side.
I want to address a comment made above by Jake. He states that the Bitterroot Resort is a better option than anything Intrawest would be involved in. From direct experience I can tell him this is naive - of course Intrawest or one of its corporate equivalents is either involved or waiting in the wings for the Forest Service decision before getting involved. The seed money for the largest resort in America does not come from Tom Maclay unless he is a multi,multi millionaire, which he is not. There are large investors behind the project- it's not some local Mom n' Pop outfit like Discovery or Snowbowl. In today's ski market and with Lolo's lack of snow it can't be.
This may be fine, but don't get your hopes up that anything about the resort will be "local". It isn't in Colorado and it won't be at the Bitterroot Resort - just ask the folks in Idaho trying to live with Tamarack.
Lolo Peak a wlderness? You can drive up to Calton Lake in a Jeep...lets not make a mockery of the term wilderness simply to stop a development. It cheapens the meaning.
I'm for this resort only if Mclay is forth coming with his plans and does it by the book. Obtain the 310 permits and honor Clean Water Act regulations...no need to sneak anything past the Missoula public. Missoula needs more options then the Bowl...maybe then Snowbowl in come around and lighten up a bit. It's only a matter of time beofre this happens. I want a local doing it.
Response.to Geoff Eastman
I appreciate your perspective and It is unfortunate that the issue can sometimes be centered around the person behind the proposal and not the proposal. I can certainly see why this is. First of all, I don’t believe folks set out to target Mr. Maclay personally and unfairly in their opposition to the resort development. However when a fellow citizen asks the public for semi-permanent development rights on 12,000 acres of public land, his integrity and trustworthiness will and should come into play. I think that adds one element. But I believe in large part, Mr. Maclay has attracted attention to himself through his own actions – promotional and otherwise.
Mr. Maclay has put himself at the forefront of the resort proposal from the beginning. I refer to the Bitterroot resort promotional brochure that was put out to the public last winter – it opens with “Tom Maclay proposes a partnership with the Missoula and Bitterroot public for development of Bitterroot Resort on Maclay Ranch and on the National Forest lands of Carlton Ridge and Lolo Peak.”
Nov. 6th 2004 Front page of the Missoulian large text, “Tom Maclay wants to turn his Lolo Peak property, and national forest land above it, into a large-scale ski resort.” Large photo with Tom Maclay forefront.
Dec. 2nd 2004 Missoulian; the article starts, “For Tom Maclay to realize his vision of a four-season destination….” Photo of Tom Maclay
Jan. 25th 2006 Missoulian; Headline: “Lawsuit filed against Maclay”
Tom Maclay as president of the Carlton Creek irrigation Company filed suit against the forest service to wrest from the national forest a private road right of way into the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness.
This is what the public sees, and who they address their comments to.