Column
Time To Nix Street Fireworks On The Fourth
The killjoy factor of banning street fireworks is undeniable. But we should do it anyway.By Jill Kuraitis, 7-04-10
![]() |
|
A history of devastating fires in Montana, Idaho and other Rocky Mountain states should be enough to deter neighborhood firework parties, but it won’t be.
Western lands include tumbleweed desert, prairie grass, tinderbox forests with stands of dry pines, and brown foothills near big neighborhoods. Why, again, do we think it’s sensible to let loose with toys that shoot sparks, especially since some people will be hammered from the neighbor’s Fourth of July party?
Despite the elementary-school logic, telling some people they can’t set off fire fountains on a street lined with pine trees is incendiary: “Ban fireworks? On the freakin’ Fourth of freakin’ July? This is America, you freak! Go recycle something, you freaking lame-ass dork!”
There are some who subscribe to the theory that people who say things like that are the ones who blow off a body part, but it’s just hearsay.
Yes, this is America, and today is the Fourth. Fireworks are fun and traditional and bring back all kinds of childhood memories and they’re pretty and every kid should have a neighborhood fireworks gathering and yes, indeed, blowing things up is a favorite pastime of the American male.
And giving up neighborhood fireworks is sad. It’s REALLY sad.
But officials in Idaho and Montana are warning that, despite a heavier-than-normal snowpack this winter, fires are as likely as ever because of the rapid and heavy growth of grasses and groundcover from the extra moisture.
About half of wildfires are human-caused, according to the National Interagency Fire Center.
That means almost half the devastation from western fires could have been prevented. If you lost a loved one, a house, a barn, your land from one of those fires, would you still set off fireworks on your street?
And are you willing to keep paying the massive bills from this nonsense?
Of course, good forest management includes letting some fires burn and setting off controlled burns when it makes sense according to experts.
But I think we can all agree we don’t want enormous, unexpected, wildly dangerous fires breaking out. And half of them are breaking out because of us. Naturally, fireworks are to blame for just a few - but the next one could be the one that roars through the foothills.
There are many ways to show your patriotism and celebrate the Fourth. Take the family to a public fireworks display, even though it pains you to skip the trip to the fireworks stand. Mingle and mix with other Americans to honor our independence.
Or have a no-fireworks backyard party. Drape the house with red, white and blue streamers and flags, hand out silly hats, pass babies around, eat barbeque and have a watermelon seed-spitting contest. Get the kids to read the first part of the Declaration of Independence out loud and play corny patriotic music on a boombox. Don’t forget to lock up nervous dogs.
You could, as we do in our neighborhood, make everybody stand up and say the Pledge and sing the Star-Spangled Banner. Every year, they groan and moan, but struggle out of their lawn chairs and do it – and they come back every year.
Sacred cows like street fireworks are hard to slay. The killjoy factor is undeniable, but so is the wreckage and ruin that fires can cause.
….from the mountains….to the prairies….
This article was first published in 2008.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
Explosives and fireworks are fun. What kind of killjoy is this?
Does that imply that fireworks are inherently destructive? Does it imply that only libertarians enjoy destructive fireworks? Or maybe that libertarians are the ones that lit the forest fires; Democrats and Republicans have far too much common sense! Or maybe it's a totally unfounded blanket generalization, kind of like Nanny Jill's assertion that: 1) since fires are caused by people, and 2) since people light fireworks, that fireworks should be banned.
I guess there will always be the "constructive conflict" between on one side the anarchists (libertarians?) and on the other side the Nanny Jills. And the rest of society falls somewhere in between.
Are some people too stupid or incompetent to set off fireworks in a safe, non-destructive manner? Absolutely! So should there be a blanket ban?
Are some people too stupid to fire a gun? To drive a car? To ingest alcohol? To throw litter in a receptacle?
Perhaps the better answer would be to eliminate all those stupid people, and be done with it.
Beyond that your may assume as you will.
I am not familiar with anything constructive about fireworks...
Fireworks are otherwise such a positive good that we should never consider banning them for their intrinsic valuelessness.
If you can't see anything constructive in fireworks, then you don't understand creativity, art, or any of the liberal arts. Don't feel alone, many people are artistically inept.
As for the house pets. You should be more concerned about the phsycological state of most pets. They are almost all in a state of phsycosis due to owners who just don't care about the animal's needs, they (the owners) just worry about themselvesand their own needs. Even the ones that claim to LOVE their pets like kids, rarely do they complete the daily hours of work necessary to have a balanced healthy pet.