The Spectacular Deathtrap
U.S. Highway 191: A Lethal Poster Child For Growth In The West
By Todd Wilkinson, 2-02-06
For Montanans who live in the southwestern part of the state, the carnage has become such a normal occurrence that it's almost regarded as an accepted afterthought of our travel.
When visitors tell us they are driving north to Bozeman during the winter or consider a day trip by car to West Yellowstone and Yellowstone National Park, the common retort we offer them is: "Go via Ennis. Stay out of the Canyon. It's longer but you'll avoid the ice and trucks."
To you readers unfamiliar with the codespeak mentioned above, it means this: U.S. Highway 191, the north to south, double-lane route running between the suburbs of Bozeman by way of the ski resort community of Big Sky to the national park gateway town of West Yellowstone is often a perilous, ice-covered deathtrap in winter. Winding along the banks of the famous Gallatin River, hidden in the shadows of two mountain ranges, coated with humidity that wafts off the river and then ices over, favored by semi-trailer-truck drivers who always seem harried for time, it is heart-palpitating.
But beside its nasty reputation, Highway 191 during the non-snowy months is something else. It is a spectacular scenic route, an avenue to great fishing, hiking, hunting, resort living, and wild country, that once served as a grand visual entryway for Easterners coming to Yellowstone. However, Highway 191 is also our symbol of misery.
In Thursday's Bozeman Daily Chronicle, reporter Walt Williams opens his story about 191 this way: "Twenty-one people have died on U.S. Highway 191 between here [Big Sky] and Four Corners since 1996, while at least another 374 people have been injured in crashes."
The rate of injuries makes 191 one of the most dangerous stretches in Big Sky Country. This fact alone has created a set of growth-related paradoxes that federal and state highway engineers are having a difficult time resolving. Everyone loves to drive 191 and yet hardly anybody looks forward to driving it during inclement weather. Everyone proclaims the inspiring beauty of the path it takes and yet most agree that any major construction fixes to make it safer will tarnish 191's world-class scenic characteristics.
Folks who have flocked to live in Big Sky in hoards did so to reside in a quieter place that was set apart from Bozeman and yet the growth-related bustle that is today engulfing Big Sky has put a dreaded edge into the road leading to and from Shangri-la.
Down the Gallatin Canyon, the valley that cradles Big Sky and tony gated destinations like The Yellowstone Club was little more than pastureland for cattle as late as the 1960s. But as residents have sought the good life in its dale, and in turn as it has attracted a flood of vacation home owners, Highway 191 has been transformed from being quaint and bucolic to become a swell with daily commuters.
Highway 191 may perhaps be southwest Montana's most prominent and viscerally-repulsive poster child for the negative impacts that growth brings for practically everyone who lives in the Gallatin Valley knows of someone who has been injured in a wreck there.
The weather is a factor; so, too, is the winding, two-lane nature of the road. Speed and poor driving also play a part. But the bane for this writer, who had endured dangerous tailgating countless times while driving with my family, is truckers.
Ask anyone who lives in Bozeman, Big Sky or West Yellowstone and you will hear them curse the truckers who often exceed the speed limit, rarely slow down out of caution, ride the bumpers of motorists in front of them, and treat 191 as a shortcut between Idaho Falls and Interstate 90.
Williams' story in the Bozeman Chronicle provides a good overview of the problems that highway officials are facing. For many, however, concern over Highway 191 is like a nightmarish lampoon of the Bill Murray film "Groundhog Day" in which each winter more people die yet we wake up confronting the same reality over and over again without any meaningful resolution. Attached here in addition to Willliams' piece is another storythat quotes state legislator Roger Koopman.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.




Comments
I drive a lot in the state and 191 is one of the routs with “life is cheap� issues.
here are some of the others that pop into my head
#2 between Lewistown and GF
the passing lanes are placed wrong and morning/evening summer traffic is blinded into the sun. The tourists that don’t know this make bad passing decisions. Just west of Eddies corner, The belt hill passing lane and a couple of other repeat killer.
#93 between Missoula and Kalispell. I can’t even bring myself to start a list about this piece of road. I don’t want to be mad all day.
#191 you got most of that covered, don’t forget the snowmobile trailer pullers (wide, more on the road in bad weather it seems, and inexperienced drivers with trailers and trailers on ice)
# 12/287 Three Forks to Helena What is wrong with these people.
Montana should be ashamed
all of these (and I’m sure others that I don’t drive on) have been repeat killers for years. (YEARS!)
Our state line sign should read “Welcome to Montana, Big Sky Country, The Last Best Place you might ever see, we have some surprises for you�
I can’t believe I need to list the obvious.
Are you ready for some rocket science?
Reroute dangerous loads around the areas of DEATH
Turn on your lights at times and in areas of DEATH
Added Driving Law enforcement in areas of DEATH
Double the fines in areas of DEATH
(helps pay for the added enforcement!)
Reduce the speed in areas of DEATH
Educate the driving unaware of the areas of DEATH
Todd, thanks and keep on this one. You will make a difference in somebody’s life.
As usual, an excellent story. In my book, what you outline here raises what may perhaps be the single greatest problem we face in the Greater Yellowstone and the Rocky Mountain West--what I call the libertarian dilemma. The libertarians tell us that the sum total of individual actions in any arena add up to the greatest good for the greatest number of people making those individual decisions. Yet, clearly, people coming to this area to fulfill their individual wants have created situations that none of us would identify as good (unless your definition of the good is the greatest profit to be gleaned from those immigrants). Just the seemingly simple problem of the danger attendant to driving Highway 191 makes this clear. Our lives are in fact worse off because of the impact of ndividual decisions by people to come to the West, decisions taken without any consideration whatsoever of how moving West negatively impacts land, wildlife, or the people already living here (who themselves, including me, made the same mistake).
We cannot conceive of or achieve the good life in the Greater Yellowstone or the West under the libertarian perspective. We have to think and act ecologically. Every act we take has greater impact beyond the sum of individual actions, and those impacts are not good.
It is clear to me that unless we develop public ways to think about, debate, and implement policies regarding the good life in terms of the values and needs of the community as a whole, which also involves wildlife and the land itself, existing above and beyond individuals, conditions will continue to worsen, where the market, not the community, determines who experiences the good life.
Best,
Robert
Why can't we have lower speed limits and MUCH greater law enforcement presence on our streets and highways? For those without the time or patience to slow down, exercise caution and courtesy, etc., be assured you would change your attitude if you or someone you love were involved in a serious collision. Think it can't happen to you? Fools.
Robert's comments are right on. This crisis is driven by selfish behavior, pure and simple. It seems to me that at the heart of the libertarian mindset is that each individual is the center of their own universe. But this defies logic. Unless we can improve our abilities to think and act collectively, I'm afraid we're doomed to an ugly society ruled by social Darwinism. In this case, I would suggest we hire substantially more highway patrol officers, to help us to think more collectively.
Oh, and if you don't like traffic? Consider breeding fewer motorists. It's a simple equation.
Thanks Todd, for providing coverage of a seriously undercovered topic.
Bill