From Adventure Journal
Utah Family Seeks $2 Million from Forest Service After Bear Killed Son
Could rangers have done more to prevent a bear attack in American Fork Canyon?By Steve Casimiro, Guest Writer, 2-24-11
![]() |
|
| Photo by Flickr user alh1. | |
Tragically, a bear killed a boy. Sliced a hole in his tent in a national forest in southern Utah four years ago, pulled him out, and that was that.
The question before a federal judge in Salt Lake City now is: Who (or what) is to blame? His parents accuse the U.S. Forest Service and want $2 million in damages. The Forest Service says the bear is to blame, but suggest contributing factors from the mom. Attorneys for both sides made their final arguments last week and U.S. District Court Judge Dale Kimball is deliberating.
A bear attack might appear to be a relatively simple event to investigate, but there are complications. Samuel Ives, 11, and his parents were camping in an undeveloped area (i.e., not in a campground) in American Fork Canyon in June 2007, when the boy was snatched from his tent in the middle of the night. His cries for help woke his mother, Rebecca Ives, who rushed to his aid but he was gone. A clean slice in the wall of his tent looked it had been done with a knife, and she thought he had been kidnapped.
“You hear horror stories of people taking your children in the night and doing horrible things to them,” she told the court last week. “I thought someone had taken him.”
Authorities who responded saw immediately it was a bear. Several hours later, they found Ives’s body 200 yards away.
Sam’s family filed the lawsuit after they learned that another camper in American Fork had had an encounter with a bear the morning of Sam’s death: The bear reached into a tent and stole a pillow and also rummaged through coolers. The Iveses argued that the Forest Service was negligent in not alerting other campers to the bear’s presence, although there were signs posted throughout the forest about the presence of bears and state officials did chase the nuisance bear away. (This was the first known fatality by a bear attack in Utah, which has black bear population of approximately 2,700.)
Jeffery Nelson, defense attorney, argued that “the Forest Service didn’t have a responsibility to protect the plaintiffs from an unforeseeable harm” and suggested that the Ives family contributed to attracting the bear. An empty granola wrapper and half-finished can of Coke Zero were found in Sam’s tent, and they suggested that Rebecca was inebriated and inattentive. She reeked so badly of alcohol, Detective Melissa Stout testified, that as they waited in Stout’s vehicle for searchers to find Sam, she had to roll the windows down. “My whole truck smelled like a alcoholic beverage,” Stout said.
Sam’s father, Kevan Francis, rebutted, “It’s basically the government saying we don’t have to protect you if you drink.”
The Ives are also suing the Utah Division of Wildlife, which tracked the bear for five hours after its first encounter with a camper.
Suing the government over a wild animal attack (and winning) is not unprecedented: In 1986, $1.5 million was awarded to the family of a girl who was mauled by a mountain lion in Caspers Wilderness Park, Orange County, California.
Steve Casimiro is a writer and editor for Adventure Journal.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
In Utah right now, many citizens are incensed at the Federal Government and wish to throw it out. Interesting that at the same time some want the Federal Government to pay them.
Some also want all wild animals dead.
What about all the people who kill innocent citizens?
The bear is not to blame. The child is not to blame and the Federal Government is not to blame.
If the mother had food in the tent--she is culpable.
If she was drunk, she is in part to blame for being negligent about the food.
Don't wish to throw the Federal Government out of Utah and then demand payment.
They did not behave responsably by going to an undeveloped camping area, their drinking may have slow their reflexes and you should never leave anything arround (coke, granola or anything sweet to attract wild life.
Some people are looking for a fast payday on the back of the fores service and Park peoples which are doing a great job
Their lawyer is as bad by entertaining the idea to sue the Park service. This case should have never been brought into a court room. If you dont want to meet wildlife dont go in the forest and stay in a hote!.
Now parents suing for negligence on the part of the parks and state. Father says,"we don;t have to protect you if you drink...and you die from cirrohis of the liver even though the bottles have warnings, the country even made the mistake of cutting off the liquour supply, and almost the entire world knows of the dangers of alcohol. But now you are suing. if the judge doesn't throw this out as a frivolous law suit, he should be barred for wasting the state's money on the case.
It is unfortunate that the condition of the modern world says, "sue for your loss." "Why accept part of the blame if you are hurt, because you make money to assuage your pain. No sense accepting any responsiblity because that is too much like real parenting."
yellowstone is one of the greatest places in this country, but it is a little unnerving when you spot a wild animal and the crowd starts to build, that a ranger comes along and scares the animal away so no one gets hurt. the stories of people pouring honey on their children's heads so they can get pics of bears is all too true.
These people seem to suggest that when camping in bear country the state should supply muzzles for bears or portable cages for humans in case of bear attack. Please allow these people to live in aanother country.
This family didn't take the nessary precautions,when they where camping.
I hope that the law suit is thrown out of the federal court & state court system. Because in a sense,there suing the people of the USA & the people of (State)Utah. If the parents of that child win,they are taking our (Tax payers money) money (Federal) & the tax payers of the state of Utah.This probably why our taxes our going so high,I think?
We owe it to ourselves and those around us, to educate each member in the group as to the dangers that are ever present in our wild places.
Just sayin'...
Steve Herrero was the expert witness for the girl's family. He easily convinced jurors the Game & Fish and U.S. Forest Service should have known the bear would return and cause trouble.
In the case of the boy in Utah, you don't need a phd in wildlife biology to know the bear would return and cause trouble. Why didn't the state post warnings at the site? The state didn't have to close the whole forest, or put signs everywhere--just at the exact site where a black bear had entered a tent earlier in the day. Seems like a common sense precaution, but that's the judge's call now.
The state's argument that no utah black bear had ever killed a person before is odd. Black bears are black bears whether they reside in Alaska or Ontario, and there are well known cases where black bears in Alaska and Ontario killed people and ate them. We don't know what flips that switch, but it certainly wasn't the candy bar wrapper or the half-finished Coke in the Utah boy's tent.
For the state to insinuate that the boy's mother was drunk is really, really sleazy. Desperation.
Having said all that, the boy's mother must feel guilty as sin IF she was impaired by alchohol. Food in the tent was a needless attractant. Bear spray and/or firearms offer better protection than your bare hands and your wits. When tent camping, put kids in the center of the tent, adults around them, gear on the outside edge.
I agree with Valance, Wes, and Skinner, natural areas, even places like the Yellowstone geyser areas should not be sanitized for likely or unlikely accidents. The public and families with young children are responsible for educating themselves in safe etiquette while enjoying the freedom and privilege of visiting these places.
So actions of the parents in not following bear country rules with food and other precautions such as being alert and sober in such surroundings leaves them culpable. I hesitate to camp in areas that are frequented by other campers before me because of slovenly camping practices. Pouring dish washing water near camps and leaving fish entrails and other traces of tempting aromas for roaming, scavenging bruins.
Also why have these parents waited four years to bring a law suit against the Utah Forest Service? Have they been wooed by an avaricious opportunistic Johnny come lately attorney?
Having posted these thought, I feel very sorry for the young boys death.
D
But I don't agree.
The government is to blame for this.
The bear was seen earlier the same day rummaging through nearby tents. That should have been a warning that the bear was not afraid of humans. At that point the park service should have not just "chased the bear away," but also made sure no one camped in that area for at least a few days.
It's like when you live in Florida and you have a chicken hanging in your kitchen window, and an alligator comes out of the swamp next to the house and tries to take the chicken. It is enough to just scare away the alligator? He will certainly come back. No, you must remove the chicken from the window. Just like the park service should have removed the campers from the campground where the bear was that morning. Same thing.
The boy was eating a candy bar in his tent,and threw the wrapper on the ground.A bear has a very good sense of smell. Campers should be educated,about the wild life in the area.Like the bears & mountain lions. The park sertvice did put up signs warning about the bears in the area. You cvan leed a bear to water,but you can't make the bear drink the water. I hope the case is thrown out of court.
Probally the most endangered bears in North America.
Don't speak about things you have no clue about.
You look really foolishy.
First, remove the "sanitary facilities," also known as outhouses, plow up the roads and parking lots, reseed the trails, and otherwise vacate the interior. Then build a dirt parking lot at the area boundary and erect the following sign:
Howling wilderness beyond this point
CAUTION
Bad weather
Rough terrain
Bears that act funny
No rescue facilities available
Enter at your own risk
Have a nice day”
- John Geirach
Coolers in the tent??? This draws the bears in. It is an incomprehensbly stupid and dangerour thing to do. And having a candy bar wrapper and a coke can out, both in the tent is asking for trouble.
Was the mom drunk? Who cares and what about dad? why did he not wake up??
Bottom line is these people were careless and are trying to put their responsibility on the FS. NOT.
ray is wrong. Signs were posted. Unfortunately, since bear siting are rare, most people dismiss the validity of the sign.
MIsingleshot is an idiot. He is the only nut in this post.
I do a lot of hiking,but I do not let the fact that I could meet a bear or some other wild animal out on the trail.Last summer a black bear had wondered into the ranger station where I worked. I got within 500ft of this bear & took a few pictures of the animal.But I did notice that when that bear took a look at me,it just went the other way,& didn't give me a 2ND thought.Maybe I was lucky?
But when my co-worker yelled at the bear it took off running,and didn't stop. I think that those campers where not using common sense. At a lot of state & USFS parks,at the trail heads will warn you of what you can & shouldn't do.Most important thing is to know your surroundings,and be alert.And use common sense. Never leave food (Candy) laying around,or in your tent.And if at all possible,bring a weapon with you,for protection.I don't think that
this family has a leg to stand on.And why did they wait so long(5yrs) to file this law suit.Why didn't they do it earlier?
I appologise. I was so razed up I mis read your post when posting. I was commenting on Jon Cheever, the post before yours.
sorry man.
You would better serve your case if you put more time into spell a message & less time criticizing bloggers. Start with appologise, incomprehensbly, dangerour and siting.
I wish that in the US people entering National Parks and Forests could simply be warned, "Bears. Enter at your own risk."
Alas, it's a bit more complicated here and it's not just lawyers.
It doesn't help that the NPS, US Forest Service, and state fish and game departments constantly talk about "bear management," as if there are mandatory meetings for bears to attend on proper behavior. This gives people the illusion the agencies have control over bear behavior. They don't.
DeaninMT
THIS IS NOT DISNEY LAND!
I do carry a big knife with me...Hope that family looses in federal & state court.They where in the wrong,by leaving food wrapers laying around,and a ice chest with food in it,in the same tent that they where sleeping in(the child) was in.
I hope that this dosen't ever happen again.Nobody wants to loose a child to death...
takes time in Federal court.Because of appeals & other excuses.
I have sympathy for this family who lost a child, but I hope the family loses in court. What if the government can't afford to pay for all these ignorant lawsuits and has no other option than to close our public lands and/or demand that the wilderness be enter at your own risk(which is how I see it anyway)? It's a no-win situation for the government and people like me and most of these other people who have commented in favor of wilderness if these lawsuits are allowed to go forward whether they win or lose. Most lawyers are the scum of the earth as it is and all they see is more money in their bank accounts when they take on a case like this.