Vilsack, Federal Ag Research, and Biotechnology


By Courtney Lowery, 10-18-09

 
 

Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack has enjoyed a somewhat on-again-off-again relationship with those advocating for sustainable agriculture and food system reform since his appointment late last year and predictably, any mention of biotechnology is what changes those dynamics. So far this month, Vilsack has hit two rocky patches with the sustainable ag community.

First, and it’s not really about him, but more about the department itself, is the appointment of Roger Beachy, who comes from the Missouri-based Danforth Plant Science Center, as the head of the newly formed National Institute of Food and Agriculture, which replaces the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service (CSREES). Ag and GMO-giant Monsanto has given funding to the Danforth Plant Science Center, a red-flag for the sustainable ag community. As Paula Crossfield writes at the Civil Eats blog, “The re-branding of CSREES worries sustainable food advocates who fear U.S. research priorities could shift with the private sector’s coaxing further towards a more biotechnology-oriented focus in an attempt to end world hunger, even though more viable solutions to hunger—a problem of distribution and not yield—exist on the ground that are both cost-effective and ready to implement now in the developing world.” (The Crossfield piece gives several good perspectives from experts on these issues—definitely worth a read.)

That worry was only heightened then, by Vilsack’s comments to the Community Food Security Coalition conference in Iowa this week. When one audience member (Jeffrey Smith, an anti-GMO activist, who writes about the exchange here on the Huffington Post) asked him about his stance on biotechnology, his response was anything but well received. From all accounts, it seems he played it well, saying he is essentially all ears when it comes to the criticisms of GMO, but then he did mention the hunger argument, saying, according to Dan Mitchell of Big Money’s The Daily Bread blog: “I’m telling you what people are telling me"—that genetic modification is necessary to feed the world. That alone elicited boos and hisses from the crowd.

However, despite the fact that most headlines were about the booing, Vilsack did make some friends at the conference. At one point he even got a standing ovation, namely for his comments on local food, comments like this one (via the Associated Press): “Locally grown food is a $5 billion business and growing,” Vilsack said. “There’s tremendous power in these ideas.”



Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.

NEW WEST FEATURES                                                                 More>>

Advertisement

Comments

Be the first to comment on this article. Please complete the form below.


Comment policy:

NewWest.Net encourages robust and lively, but civil participation from our readers. By posting here, you agree to the NewWest.Net terms of service. You agree to keep your comments on topic, respectful and free of gratuitous profanity. Contributions that engage in personal attacks, racism, sexism, bigotry, hatred or are otherwise patently offensive will be subject to removal.

Other than using a filter that scans for comment spam, we do not moderate contributions before they are posted and we do not review every thread, so we ask that you help us in keeping the discussions civil and appropriate. Please email info@newwest.net to notify us of comments that may violate these guidelines. Thanks for your help and cooperation. Click here for some tips on how to best interact on NewWest.Net.

Your Comment

Name

Email

Remember my name and email address.

Notify me of follow-up comments.

Advertisement