Should You Vote? 20/20 Thinks You Might Be Too Stupid
By Robert Struckman, 10-14-08
Last week, a faux reporter on the comedian Jon Stewart’s Daily Show produced a hilarious report on undecided, swing voters. The point of the segment was to lampoon the stupid bloc, the “swingest of swing” voters, who hold the outcome of every election in their idiotic hands.
The Daily Show segment seemed funny until I saw this piece by reporter John Stossel on 20/20, which actually makes the argument that uninformed young voters are too ignorant to make decisions about America’s leadership and should avoid the polls on Election Day.
Stossel reaches his conclusion by going to a rock concert and asking newly registered voters fill-in-the-blank questions, standard high school civics class fare. How many members are in the U.S. Senate? What’s Roe V. Wade?
Some know the answers, he intones ominously, but most do not.
Then he makes the tremendous and illogical leap that if these young voters can’t identify a photo of a U.S. Supreme Court Justice, they “don’t know anything” and aren’t knowledgeable enough to vote. He even gets a so-called expert, conservative author Bryan Caplan who wrote The Myth of the Rational Voter, to characterize politics as so “complicated” that important national decisions should be left “in wiser hands.”
Where do you start on something like this? Has Caplan ever heard of “democracy?” Oh, and the geniuses on Wall Street and K Street have sure done a great job, right? Maybe we should leave everything in their hands?
Underlying Stossel’s ridiculous report is the offensive, Puritanical notion that he and Caplan somehow know best what qualifies someone to vote. It’s the idea that there’s a pool of information out there that, once obtained, leads every logical voter to the same “correct” conclusion. Is that what politics is?
It seems Stossel and Caplan (whose book was applauded by the right-wing thinktank, the Cato Institute) are actually arguing that the interests of regular people should stay out of the way of the interests of America’s elite, who obviously know best.
Maybe each of Stossel’s young voters actually knows about their own economic realities, maybe about the job market, student loans, the price of gasoline and airline tickets. Maybe that’s the knowledge voters use—along with notions of what government should do— to make decisions. And maybe that’s just as it should be.
Like all voters, I’m not always happy with election outcomes. But isn’t that the point with democracy?
Now. For some levity.... You gotta see this from the Daily Show.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.




Comments
Voter stupidity is endemic and it's part of the reason this nation is so poorly led. Good Lord, they can't ID Ruth Bader Ginsburg but can spot Judge Judy?
So pardon me if -- even though voters may understand "economic realities, maybe about the job market, student loans, the price of gasoline and airline tickets" -- they don't help themselves at all if they have no real understanding of how "government" affects, or does not affect, those realities.
Even if electoral morons are split half and half, (I'd LOVE to see the Pew Trusts fund an unbiased and systematic survey on the actual breakdown), with 50 plus one being the dividing line I don't think we are well served by ignorance-driven fickle chance by any means.
I really wish voting was a right, contingent upon passing a basic intelligence or current-affairs test. The embarrassment of flunking might be compensated for by better governance.
But if you're looking for stupid, try THESE quotes in the NYTimes this morning from Southern voters giving an excuse for not voting for Obama.
I won't advocate denying an American the vote on account of stupidity, but these folks are far, far more stupid (along with the ones who say Obama's-a-Muslim, Obama's-an-Arab, Obama-consorts-with-terrorists, etc.) than kids who don't recognize a Supreme Court justice. Jeez:
"He's neither-nor. He’s other. It’s in the Bible. Come as one. Don’t create other breeds.”
-- pipefitter RICKY THOMPSON, in Mobile, Ala., speaking about Barack Obama
“I would think of him as I would of another of mixed race. God taught the children of Israel not to intermarry. You should be proud of what you are, and not intermarry.”
-- retired textile worker GLENN REYNOLDS, 74, Martinsdale, Va.
Even if you could put aside for the moment their racism about those who "create other breeds," since when does that act by others make the product of their unions less than human? Like, Obama had some say in the matter??!
Again, not that that matters . . . but the "logic" of these racist idiots is breath-taking.
And Jim Crow laws aren't the same as poll taxes and whatnot...
you should know that.
But, even though the NYT was pretty much pimping for Obama with its article, the statements cited make the point. There needs to be a higher level of competence on the part of the voting public. Then perhaps we'd wind up with a higher level of same in the elected leadership rather than the bipartisan ineptitude we "enjoy" these days.
Look, gullible dummies are easy to manipulate. Ethically, can any of you say that's good? I say it's wrong.