WyoFile Feature
Yellowstone to Yukon: Conservationist Advocates for Key Wildlife Corridor
In the largest remaining intact mountain ecosystem in the world, “you can’t isolate nature from the rest of nature and expect her to survive.”By Ruffin Prevost, WyoFile, Guest Writer, 7-05-11
![]() |
|
| The northern lights shine in Tombstone Range Provincial Park, Yukon Territory. Canada. Florian Schulz photo, on view in "Yellowstone to Yukon: Freedom to Roam," organized by the Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture in Seattle, Wash., on display at the Buffalo Bill Historical Center in Cody, Wyo., through Aug. 7. | |
The bear went over the mountain — as many kids learn from the popular song — to see what he could see. But the wolf went over the mountain and just kept on going, covering 40,000 square miles in two years.
Pluie, a well-traveled adult, female gray wolf tracked in 1991 by Canadian wildlife officials, was the inspiration for the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative. Conceived in 1993 and formally established in 1997, the joint U.S.-Canada nonprofit group works with local landowners, agencies and organizations across the Northern Rockies to preserve and connect wildlife corridors that are crucial to the migration of key species like grizzly bears, elk and golden eagles.
“You can’t isolate nature from the rest of nature and expect her to survive,” said Harvey Locke, a conservationist and former attorney who founded Yellowstone to Yukon.
“The golden eagles that winter in Wyoming spend their summers in the Canadian Rockies,” Locke said last week during a presentation at the Buffalo Bill Historical Center in Cody. His talk also promoted “Yellowstone to Yukon: Freedom to Roam,” a photography exhibition by Florian Schulz, on display at the BBHC through Aug. 7.
Scientific understanding of the importance of wildlife corridors has been growing over the last 20 years, as new technologies and tracking techniques have allowed biologists to follow groups and individual animals over vast distances, Locke said, who was born in Canada and lives in Boulder, Colo. A more detailed picture of how animals move across the landscape has emerged, along with a stronger appreciation for the importance of key migration corridors.
“The big, wild, core protected areas are fundamentally successful,” he said, citing Yellowstone National Park and its recovering populations of grizzly bears and gray wolves as a good example of conservation success.
But to maintain a diverse and healthy large mammal population, wildlife must be free to travel, rather than remain isolated in protected “islands” like Yellowstone or other highly managed areas, Locke said.
“One hundred-plus years ago, this fabulous system of big reserves was put in place. But as great as it is, we’ve learned it isn’t quite sufficient,” he said.
“Yellowstone is very, very vulnerable because it’s become an island.”
Radio tracking data shows that animals like Pluie the wolf cover huge stretches of territory, but often encounter difficult bottlenecks to navigate in their migration patterns, as new roads, housing and other development continue fracturing wild places.
Locke became a full-time conservationist in 1999, and he travels and lectures in support of preserving the Yellowstone to Yukon corridor, the largest remaining intact mountain ecosystem in the world.
Yellowstone to Yukon partners with land conservation trusts like The Nature Conservancy and other groups across the region to reach voluntary agreements with landowners to protect key wildlife travel corridors.
The idea is to keep the landscape “permeable” to animals, Locke said. Though the 2,000-mile corridor is staggering in its size and scope, protecting just tiny tract can prove critical to specific groups of key species. Yellowstone to Yukon is working to protect parcels as small as 80 acres, for instance, in a key grizzly bear migration corridor in southern Canada, just north of Montana.
The ongoing effort of land deals in the Yellowstone to Yukon corridor has resulted in the largest collaboration of land trusts in world, he said.
Their efforts focus on large-scale projects like expanding the boundaries of Nahanni National Park Reserve in Canada’s Northwest Territories to pushing for construction of wildlife overpasses and underpasses spanning highways in places like Banff National Park in Canada.
Locke said construction of a wildlife overpass is progressing now near Pinedale for use by pronghorn antelope as part of their twice-yearly migration from their summer home in Grand Teton National Park to winter range in the Red Desert.
The well-documented migration route of 125 miles or more through the Gros Ventre Mountains is among the longest in North America, and archaeological evidence suggests that the animals have followed the same trails for more than 6,000 years.
Some critics have questioned the cost, necessity and effectiveness of wildlife overpasses, but Locke said that Canadian wildlife officials have closely tracked the use of such structures.
There is a “learning curve” involved for animals to use the crossing, and it may sometimes take up to five years before a particular species or population begins using an overpass or underpass, he said. But over the last 15 years, Canadian wildlife officials have documented more than 200,000 individual wildlife crossings in Banff National Park.
People who live in the Yellowstone to Yukon region instinctively understand how animals travel north and south throughout the region, Locke said. Human cultural patterns have followed the same route for centuries.
“People have known for a long time that this is one big landscape,” he said.
Locke cited the work of German-born artist Carl Rungius, who spent decades in the Western U.S. and Canada painting big game. First arriving in Wyoming in 1895, Rungius fell in love with the landscape and wildlife, and immigrated to America, where he traveled and painted literally from Yellowstone to Yukon.
Local Skepticism
Not all of the ideas Locke backs as part of Yellowstone to Yukon have met with universal approval, including among some locals living around Yellowstone, though none raised concerns during his discussion.
“The basic idea is that we want everything that belongs here to continue living here, and if it’s missing, to put it back,” he said in an interview before his presentation.
In Yellowstone, that has included the reintroduction of gray wolves in 1995, a move that has proven biologically successful, but that remains politically unpopular with many local residents.
Some remain skeptical of conservation efforts that seek to expand or broaden protected habitat areas for wolves, grizzly bears, bison and other species, fearing growing pressure for further land use restrictions or limits to development on private lands.
Though Banff National Park has healthy wolf and bear populations, it is not home to any wild bison, so Yellowstone to Yukon is working to reintroduce the animals there, Locke said.
Management of Yellowstone bison herds has been the source of ongoing controversy in recent years, as the animals wander across the park’s northern boundaries in winter and move toward private lands. Ranchers in the region fear the bison could transmit brucellosis to their cattle.
Brucellosis can cause miscarriages in animals, and livestock producers in other states often demand negative test results before accepting cattle raised around Yellowstone. Rare cases of infected cattle can lead to expensive testing, and sometimes the elimination of entire herds, costing the industry millions of dollars.
Some wildlife advocates question the National Park Service policy of managing bison movements outside Yellowstone’s northern boundaries, and point out that elk can also carry brucellosis, but are not restricted the same way.
But the bison issue is viewed differently in Banff, Locke said, because “Parks Canada has herds of disease-free bison, and there are no ranchers that abut Banff.”
Locke said the idea of reintroducing bison to Banff “has a lot of social acceptance” in the local area, and Canadian park officials are moving forward with the idea.
Large mammal populations across North America have shrunken drastically over the last century, making it important to protect or restore populations wherever possible, Locke said.
“The world is a scaled system,” he said. “There is no part of the world that’s isolated from any other.”
Ruffin Prevost is managing editor of WyoFile, an independent, nonprofit news service focused on the people, places and policy of Wyoming.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
First of all we need to get our country on a sound financial base, that means putting nice luxuries, which is what this is, on hold. I have no problem with individuals putting their own money into a project like this, but absolutely NO taxpayer dollars via the government should go into it. We MUST pay down our debt, not finance pie in the sky stuff like this.
Next absolutely no restrictions on food or energy production can be impacted by this. Our people and their well being must be our first consideration, we are already dependent on countries that do not like us for a lot of our fuel, while desolate areas like ANWR are off limits to fuel production, and American taxpayers cannot afford fuel for their homes or vehicles.
This is the United States of America, our private property rights must take precedence over someone's big idea of idealism. And adequate food has to be a priority.
Best wishes!
Think you are gonna put me and my family in a commune, Think again dude. Not without a fight.
(gestapo run, police state) area of Yellowstone was a good model. So naturally I just stopped reading the article.
Grizzlies just do not migrate!
At one time, the Grizzly we know today only in Yellowstone and just south of of the Canadian border north up to the Territories ranged from ---get this---Hudson Bay to the mountains near Guadalajara Mexico, and from Ohio all the way to the Pacific Coast.
Today there is this island population centered on Yellowstone , a few bears scattered up the Continental Divide , and some fewer dispersers. All in all, 1-2 percent of the bear numbers pre-Columbus on 1-2 percent of their former range. Five of the seven subspecies were exterminated by Man between 1700 and 1922, only two hundred years after they had lived well for manyt housands of years.
I'd say we have some debts to pay... amends to make ..mistakes to correct. Who appointed us humans to be The Decider ?
Let's go with bears in areas where the habitat and prey base are suitable right now . That would be a lot of territory not currently occupied by grizzlies, but could and should be. Just in Wyoming alone there is a great deal of good Grizzly habitat that is off limits to them due to an artificial boundary enforcement, the Primary Conservation Area, that is not reflective of the bears needs but of people's political wants. Southern Wind Rivers; Wyoming and Salt River Range ; Pryors and north Big Horns
There's a lot of space and latitiude between suitable existing public lands habitat and " everywhere".
And a great deal of that is straight up the Continental Divide from my back door in northwest Wyoming to the Yukon. Except Wyoming Game & Fish keeps grizzlies inside a zoo boundary in all directions. They keep the bears on an island.
It's not right. And they make it harder than it needs to be. When grizz get in trouble in Jackson , they are brought over to Cody . When bears get in trouble in Cody , they are trapped and relocated to Jackson. It's a circle jerk. G&F;only has about 5-6 places on eithjer side of Yellowstone ( east or south boundary) that they can drop off a bear from a pickup truck and culverttrap trailer. Some bears are racking up frequent flier miles.
What they need to do is take bears that have been managed more than once to a wholly new range...in Idaho , western and south-central Montana, the Unitahs of Utah , or even a lot of Colorado... in breedable pairs replenished.
Just like wolves, grizzly management isn't about bear plans, it's about people plans.
The places that dewey mentions are areas where the grizzly could live.... But get into the type of trouble that we saw last week in Yellowstone & more. People like Dewey need to ante up & pay for the burden they want to be on the Fish & Game departments.
Federal money for the half million dollars being spent in Minnesota cleaning up after the wolf has dried up! http://minnesota.publicradio.org/www_publicradio/tools/media_player/popup.php?name=minnesota/news/features/2011/07/06/wolfcontrol_20110706_64
I'll bet attitudes at the Minnesota Fish and Game will be a changing without the heft ransom the feds were paying to make parts of Minnesota a predator pit!
I pay for my grizzly management just like everyone else , with my state taxes. Big Game hunting does not pay its own way in Wyoming (except for Pronghorn), so every hunting license sold costs the taxpayer . Think subsidy , since G&F;has to use state funds and outside sources to make up the deficit in hunting license revenue. Fully 1/4 of Wyoming G&F;'s budget is from federal grants, and very little of that are conservation/excise tax funds.
We subsidize hunting and wildlife management in Wyoming , bow to stern. I pay my share , even by not hunting. And there are fewer and fewer hunters and hunter-days. Let's dispense with the mythology that hunting is what pays for wildlife conservation. That's only half true.
Your comments are tangential, as usual.
The only thing that we ever saw groups like DOW do was pay for depredation. That has now been terminated & the group remains to be a leech on our wildlife systems. They paid for the depredation like a Drug dealer gives out free dope to the junkie to get them hooked, then sucks them dry after they can't shack the habit!
You really believe in the maximum predators and maximum cost to taxpayers , ranchers, pet owners and game herd…… right dewey!
Dewey, The grizzly & the wolf..... They fit so well with your anti-hunting and anti-ranching facade
I said that Wisconsin once had grizzlies--historical, past tense . That Wisconsin does not now is tragically symptomatic. As are you.
Quit putting words in my mouth and hands.
You cannot draw breath and use money without paying taxes, so what exactly is your point here ?
You can try to blame it on your favorite whipping boy the Enviros and/or endangered species, but that won't fly either. It's not 1975 any more.
Why don't you just READ the Game and Fish budget expenses and revenues at the state GF website like I have. It's all there in black and white at http://gf.state.wy.us
Never mind. I'll just close by saying how much I personally RESENT your notion that the Game and Fish BUREAUCRACY can't live within its means and you reverse blame that for an 'environmental entertainment tax' that you made up to coddle your own delusions. What do you blame the budget deficit at the State Parks department on ?---old people insisting on wheelchair accessible outhouses at the boat docks under the Americans With Disabilities Act ? Do you blame the highway department's $ 200 million shortfall on people driving fuel efficient cars and thus not paying as much fuel tax on a Prius as they used to on a gas-guzzling GM tunaboat 4-door or Dodge Ram truck ?
I say Crusty Old Halfheimer's Curmudgeonly Crap Tax. According to Todd, environmentalists are the root of all evil. Maybe we should've just let the American symbol, the Bald Eagle, die a painful death to spite the Greens... Todd sez things like dat.
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2011/07/07/shutdown-wildlife-conservation-livestock-wolf-predation/
The wolf lover wants you to believe that it only costs the confirmed / paid depredation... like the well over $100,000 that Minnesota had last year & some people love to tout. But reality is that is cost much more! The article above says it cost a half million to clean up after wolves (Minnesota depredation management costs) for Minnesota that the Feds were paying in random!
When states no longer get that federal money, I predict that wolves will be brought down to that minimums agreed upon early on in the introduction & what is actually written in the Great Lake states wolf plans!
The Wolf lovers only have themselves to blame. The one thing that they have done that is a clear as night and day is that they have treated the landowners (ranchers) with total disrespect, insolence & contempt. Wolves cannot and will not be able to survive without traveling on private land..... this animal needs a sympathetic landowner if it is to survive in the lower 48 states. Look at what is happening in New Mexico!
I have been on these blogs for some time & and the one thing is clear Dewey / Cody Coyote has been one of the biggest offenders of disrespect for the landowner / rancher along with a few others. With countless "welfare ranchers" statements & continued villainification of the rancher dewey & others have been a factor in the attitude of the very man whom owns the lands the wolf travels night and day. Keep it up dewey.... you’re the best blogger we have on the pro wolf management circuit! If you look take all of the news of late…. Budget riders, cuts in spending, wolves delisting, record depredation, Wyoming wolf plan approval etc it probably looks like the bus is headed right at the wolf lovers……. Some don’t have enough sense to get out of the way & some love to drive the bus…. Right dewey, right Jon Cleever
Mike why don't you stir the pot, prod and poke on dairy price supports so I can make a copy of this thread and post it down at the feed mill! I love gaining support for wolf management. I've done it before with some of the stuff on Ralph Maughan anti-hunting hate site etc. The boys love it down there & they are sure to point it out to the customers that come in! This thread isn't to that quality yet, but you never know!
We had better get back to basics and da** fast or we are going to be in history books of the far future as to how a rich country can destroy itself.
We humans have ravaged the planet unnecessarily except to consume vast amounts of natural r esources land, and fresh w ater to build castles, feed our gullets, get fat , and breed more of us to begin the vicious cycle anew. Mankind is indistinguishable from a virus or cancer in this context. We are consuming the planet. And you would have us do MORE of that ? Cripes, Todd...look around. A little further than Big Horn County WY if you can.
Your priorities are far from my priorities. But at least I am trying to be part of the solution by thinking globally instead of rewarding my wallet and behaving like a petty lord in my personal castle.
I am anti-arrogance and pro-planet. Humans are not my favorite species at the moment.
I remind you this article is about opening assured wildlife corridors from Wyoming to the arctic, not about recreation. If you think that wilderness is strictly for recreation only , go back to elementary school and start with 3rd grade and relearn the importance of wild lands to the health of the planet. Then get current on the deforestation of the Amazon, the desertification of Saharan Africa, the Middle East , and Australia, and the cumulative destructive impact that one species ---Us ---is having above all the millions of other species combined. If you can't see that .....
What I will add is that Homo sapiens long ago surrendered any birthright to be the " Supreme Creature" of this planet , by virtue of its behavior since developing technical civilization and perfecting both wargare and gross consumption in a geologic blink of the eye.
Manifest Destiny is a hallucination and pretty bad dogma. We humans are a miserable lot . We need to see ourselves for what we really are, on a planetary scale, rather than what we imagine or fantasize ourselves to be instead.
Our arrogance is astronomical.
Quit putting words in my hand and reading what I don't write on the back of your fluttering eyelids or whereever you see these words I did not myself say, please.
Sometimes the best course of action is to leave something alone, like land.
I said nothing about wolves or litigation. That would be off topic.
P.S. Your grammar is atrocious, by the way. Knocks your credibility down quite a few notches.
Your distain for the rancher, more wolves the merrier, and promotion of things like the constitutionality of the rider are well documented in threads like this one! Are you saying you’re pro-wolf management? Are you saying you’re not anti-hunting and anti-ranching?
Once again, you have a great game plan on this Yukon to Yellowstone corridor!
Stay on topic if at all possible. And quit casting aspersions and throwing fecal matter if you don't otherwise have something to contribute to the discourse. ( you don;t)
I'm not anti-hunting nor anti-ranching. I am anti-special interest hunting lobb and antislob hunters, and have very considered opinions about the role ofr anching in today's economic climate. Which you obviously are so polarized and narrow minded and only see black & white with no intermediate greys that you cannot eprcieve there might be a range of opinion here , instead of Either/Or.
I supported the Yellowstone to Yukon concept long before it was a mainstream media topic. I was inspired by the Craighead Brothers research into Grizzly habitat using satellite remote sensing imagery and resource analysis which showed that good grizzly habitat exists in large portions of interior North America. Going south as well as north from Yellowstone.
That was in 1975, one of the earliest applications of LANDSAT imagery that was meaningful to me, especially since grizzlies had just been listed it was good to know they had other realms to call home if need be. And should be.
You are one presumptive abrasive SOB . And if that gets this thread shut down , so be it.
The only way to successfully live with predators is to have them live with us. You cannot destroy the rights of even a few people so that you can have wolves or any other species in more places. Being inhumane to humans does not make one a good steward of anything.
Boy, that is in the eye of the beholder. Sorry you feel that way . But it certainly can't be derived from anything I've said here. That's your own perception. ( But it does travel both ways)
Again, read what i write , not what comes out of that sausage maker you call your Frontal Lobes.
Todd-Reality 22...once again I have to remind you that I-Me-Dewey is not the issue here. Keep your personal prejudices to yourself, please
The topic is "Yellowstone to Yukon".
Try staying on the rails and out of the weeds.
Idiot Post Quota exceeded...
Must be that we can't cross reference Cody Coyote Id over others like his dewey & apply scrutiny between the two.
Credibility at its finest!
You are across both those lines. Out in the weeds.
p.s. I was out before dawn this morning to photograph the full moonset. At 5: 30 AM , a Wyo Game and Fish truck drove by me with the grizzly bear culvert trap. Te only reason those guys would be out before dawn on a weekend morning is to trap and relocate a bear.
So...we obviously need more room for recovering Grizzly Bear populations a little further afield than the immediate neighborhood.
Remember, I AM NOT THE ISSUE. Yellowstone to Yukon is. If you can't keep from denigrating the comments and personalizing with prejudice, I am going tor recommend that NewWest disallow your commentary.
Can you POSSIBLY write respectful informative comments ? I wonder....
Congratulations to folks in Wyoming. I consider myself an eco advocate and I have to say your wolf plan made the most sense, might venture north to buy a tag and do my civic duty in the years to come.
The ranchers usually do the bullying. It's their M.O. in many scenarios, actually , but endangered species always, almost without exception where I live.
Having said that , where I live and observe, the environmental groups and the real conservationists are always willing to work with ranchers and landowners , and genuinely reach out without being asked to. Why do you think otherwise? Can you provide some detailed attribution where enviros " bully" ranchers ? Please be specific.
And by the way , Respect is never a given. It must be earned. Those ranchers who earn it get my respect. Case by case basis , so put away your big fat tar brush and get out your 000 fine detail brush. There's a lot of ranchers out there that I respect and work with . Just a lot more that I don't... case by case basis.
Reverence? R U kidding?? Idolatry is not in the equation. Ever. That's perverse. Superstition personified.
Admiration , like respect, is a product coming out, not a component going in. It, too, must be earned, on a case by case basis. Results driven , not a mandate. Ad nauseum.
You reall'y don;t get it, do you ? You are all talking points and no substance. Nothing of substance, just deconstruction and dystopia and quite a bit of vitriol.
Maybe when you add something worthwhile which reflects your own wisdom and experiences instead of the circular jerked dogma you thrive on , you will get a genuine considered response.
On August 5th 2010 Judge donnie molloy sided with 14 environmental groups to say that Idaho & Montana could not delist. It is typical of you to ignore what is right in front of your face. For these groups (and your support I might add) to sue based on a technicality of the law (irrelevant boarders) to prevent ranchers in wolf country in the states of Montana and Idaho from protecting their livestock is bullying plain and simple! After the groups won on their technicality & realized that it exposed flaws in the ESA & outraged ranchers dealing with the wolf they tried to get it reversed. It's like the bully at school knocking a kid off his bike then realizing that everybody's watching so he tries to pick him up and get him back on the bike!
Dewey, How many times have you & your ilk written welfare ranchers! The key here is the indiscriminant rancher"s" vs rancher if it was case by case you and your lynch mob would never drag them all down with "ranchers". ENOUGH SAID!
The word reverence was chosen carefully..... Your reaction makes me smile! I used the word years ago in dealings with a New Jersey Accountant, my company had me teaching him some system stuff that I had implemented locally. He had the same reaction as old dewey! :o) priceless This spring I hunted Turkey a little north of me on a farmers back field, last fall hunted the deer traveling & eating on his fields..... I showed him a little reverence offering to drive the tractor during the busy planting season, trimmed the brush back on the river bottom field fall before last & brought him a store bought turkey breast a few weeks ago!
reverence = to regard somebody or something with deep respect.
Your wolves have been and will continue to traveling on the ranchers property running cattle, maiming & killing their livestock & making them worry about what the night will bring! Dewey, that is apparently not enough that the rancher has done for you, but it is for me, they have earned my respect and will get my respect/ admiration....
Dewey, The city slicker that takes he dog out for a walk and lets it do its thing on the neighbor's lawn & don't clean it up. Some neighbors just clean it up.... When it goes on for decades, I prefer helping out the neighbor by boxing it up an mailing it back to him! Have a good day!