http://www.newwest.net/topic/main/C72/L37/ New West Network: The Voice of the Rocky Mountains en info@newwest.net Copyright 2009 Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:06:22 MST Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:06:22 MST http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/roadless_rule_bill_the_timing_is_right_so_just_pass_it/C72/L37/ http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/roadless_rule_bill_the_timing_is_right_so_just_pass_it/C72/L37/ Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:42:04 MST Unnoticed by many, two members of Congress from Washington have decided it’s about time to do something to resolve the seemingly endless debate over the future of our last roadless lands. Senator Maria Cantwell and Representative Jay Inslee, both Democrats, have re-introduced the National Forest Roadless Area Conservation Act (S.1738, H.R. 3563) to codify the Clinton-era Roadless Rule that has been on a legal roller coaster for the past nine years. http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/the_problem_of_the_small_state_senator/C72/L37/ http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/the_problem_of_the_small_state_senator/C72/L37/ Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:27:47 MST In the ongoing red state/blue state, small state/big state public opinion tussle, the small states have been on the losing end lately, with small state Senators having huge influence on two major pieces of legislation, influence that is either significantly weakening, and even threatening to kill, those bills. That leaves plenty of people wondering how it is that a handful of senators who represent a tiny fraction of the nation’s population get to decide for all of us. But I think the real question needs to be whether that tiny fraction of the nation’s population is really being represented, and if not, what are they going to do about it. http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/give_me_some_real_health_care_reform_and_nobody_will_get_hurt/C72/L37/ http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/give_me_some_real_health_care_reform_and_nobody_will_get_hurt/C72/L37/ Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:13:09 MST We're all thinking about health care reform and if Congress can really come through for us on an issue that touches us all. At the same time, I suppose you're asking what this issue is doing on the outdoor page. The answer is, I might have found a way for our the-end-justifies-the-means Congress to pass meaningful health care reform without hurting their NRA grade. http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/political_irony_reigns_as_president_obama_signs_masterblaster_bill/C72/L37/ http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/political_irony_reigns_as_president_obama_signs_masterblaster_bill/C72/L37/ Wed, 27 May 2009 17:00:08 MST I suppose I should let it go, but nobody else does, so why should I? This is my third column about the now-infamous administrative rule to allow loaded, concealed firearms in national parks and wildlife refuges (links at end of column). The rule evolved into a symbolic and high priority political battle, and both pro-gun and anti-gun groups seized on it as a way to find out who had the power. And now we know. The gun lobby wins, easily, which is no surprise to me. http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/branding_wilderness_lite/C72/L37/ http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/branding_wilderness_lite/C72/L37/ Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:40:16 MST Editor's note: Second in a two-part series on resolving the conflict between mountain bikers and hikers over protecting roadless lands. Click here for the first part, plus a very interesting comment thread. Last week, I wrote about options hikers and wilderness groups had to make peace with mountain bikers so the two key constituencies could work together to protect roadless land. One option was urging Congress to pass another organic act creating a true alternative land designation. But what to call it? In past commentaries, I'm used the words "Wilderness Lite" to refer to various land designations that provide almost as much protection as the "Big W" Wilderness Congress designates under the Wilderness Act of 1964. Basically, cutting to the chase, I can more precisely define "Wilderness Lite" as "Wilderness that allows mountain biking." http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/crapo_conservationists_laud_passage_of_public_lands_bill/C72/L37/ http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/crapo_conservationists_laud_passage_of_public_lands_bill/C72/L37/ Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:00:16 MST UPDATED 6 pm, March 30. President Barack Obama signed the public lands bill today. George Cooper, President and CEO of the Theordore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, attended the White House signing ceremony and invoked the legacy of Theodore Roosevelt in assessing the president’s actions. “Theodore Roosevelt once said, ‘We have fallen heirs to the most glorious heritage a people ever received, and each one must do his part if we wish to show that the nation is worthy of its good fortune.' With today’s events, Roosevelt’s words take on a new and deeper meaning. Ratification of this historic measure represents an important victory for sportsmen, as well as for our natural resources and activities that rely on our nation’s public lands." After years of compromise, delay, failed votes, parliamentary games, all frequently sprinkled with vitriol from detractors, but countered with the hard work by many thousands of supporters, Congress has, finally, passed the Omnibus Public Lands Bill. The 1,300-page behemoth is actually a compilation of around 170 pieces of legislation, including Idaho's first wilderness in 29 years, protection for the Wyoming Range, and wilderness and wild river designations in nine states, not including Montana. The Senate passed the massive bill, again (click here to read about it), last week. Yesterday, the House voted 285-140 to pass the same bill. Since the House passed an exact copy of the Senate-passed bill, it won't be stalled in a conference committee and subject to re-votes. Instead, it goes directly to the White House where everybody involved expects President Obama to sign it, probably next week. http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/house_votes_on_public_lands_bill_today/C72/L37/ http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/house_votes_on_public_lands_bill_today/C72/L37/ Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:15:33 MST THIRD UPDATE: March 25, 12:15 PM. The House voted 283-140 to pass public lands bill with 136 Republicans and 4 Democrats voting "nay." This would have been enough to pass for a super-majority, two-thirds vote. SECOND UPDATE, March 25, 9:15 am. UPDATED March 19, 11 a.m. at end of article. Anybody interested in protecting public land knows about S.22, a massive piece of legislation, a compilation of 190 bills that Congress has been working on for years. Six days ago, it unexpectedly failed (click here), unable to get a super majority in the U.S. House of Representatives by a mere two votes, 282-144, even though the Senate had passed it 73-21. That bad beat made political insiders scratch their heads. Why would the House leadership bring S. 22 up for a vote under suspension of rules, which requires a two-thirds majority, without the votes to pass it? I've been calling around on to get the answer to that question and to find out what might happen next. Here's the skinny on the House vote and alas, how President Obama will have the opportunity to sign this bill into law as early as next week. You could call it "revolutionary" politics. http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/house_votes_down_public_lands_bill/C72/L37/ http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/house_votes_down_public_lands_bill/C72/L37/ Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:24:14 MST UPDATED at 12:55 pm. Update at end of article. In a surprise vote this morning, the U.S. House of Representatives failed to achieve the two-thirds majority needed to pass a landmark public lands protection bill that would have ensured access and opportunity for hunters and anglers today and for generations to come. That news just in courtesy of Trout Unlimited, one of the main backers of the massive bill that the U.S. Senate has already passed. http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/obama_get_real_on_assault_weapons_put_a_cork_in_holder/C72/L37/ http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/obama_get_real_on_assault_weapons_put_a_cork_in_holder/C72/L37/ Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:13:11 MST I went to my first gun show a couple of weeks ago, but when I wrote about it, I left out the buzz concerning the proposed reauthorization of the so-called "Assault Weapon Ban (AWB)." I have a lot to say about it, so I saved it for this column. For starters, with all the massive messes the Obama administration has to unravel, why is our new president allowing his attorney general to embark on a meaningless mission to nowhere? And in conflict with his campaign commitments and his party's plans to stay in power? http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/oops_the_nra_agrees_with_obama/C72/L37/ http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/oops_the_nra_agrees_with_obama/C72/L37/ Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:29:03 MST Editor's Note: I posted my weekly column (Are Bison Wildlife or Livestock?) early this week, but I couldn't help filling up my normal Thursday slot with this little political irony for all my gun nutty friends.--Bill Schneider Politics can be frustrating and maddening, but it can also be interesting and ironical.